Park Joo Hyun, Choi Sung Wook, Shin Eun Ho, Park Myung Hoon, Kim Myung Ku
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017731626. doi: 10.1177/2309499017731626.
Although intraarticular tranexamic acid (IA-TXA) administration or drainage clamping are popular methods used to reduce blood loss after total knee replacement (TKR), the protocol remains controversial. We aimed (1) to establish new protocols through investigating whether two methods, that is, low-dose (500 mg) IA-TXA plus 30-min drain clamping and drainage clamping for the first 3 h without IA-TXA, can reduce blood loss and blood transfusion after unilateral TKR and (2) to make recommendations related to clinical application.
This study, conducted from September 2014 to June 2016 related to enrolled 95 patients with primary osteoarthritis who were to have a unilateral cemented TKR, was nonrandomized and retrospective. In group A, the drain was released following tourniquet deflation. In group B, 500-mg TXA was injected into the knee joint via a drain tube after fascia closure and the drain was clamped for the first 30 min to prevent leakage. In group C, the drain was clamped for the first 3-h postoperation. Demographic characteristics and clinical data were collected, including the levels of hematocrit (Hct), the total blood loss (TBL), drained blood volume (BV), the amount of blood transfused, and any complications that developed.
We found a significantly lower postoperative TBL, drained BV, decreasing Hct level, and less transfused BV in the IA-TXA injection group (group B) and the 3-h drainage clamping group (group C) compared to the conventional negative drainage group (group A; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups B and C ( p = 0.99).
The drainage clamping method can be safer than IA-TXA administration in patients with risk factor of venous thromboembolic complication. Furthermore, the IA-TXA administration can be more optimal than drainage clamping in patients with high bleeding tendency or lateral retinacular release during TKR, who would be concerned about postoperative wound complication.
尽管关节腔内注射氨甲环酸(IA-TXA)或引流管夹闭是全膝关节置换术(TKR)后减少失血的常用方法,但该方案仍存在争议。我们旨在(1)通过研究两种方法,即低剂量(500mg)IA-TXA加30分钟引流管夹闭和在不使用IA-TXA的情况下最初3小时引流管夹闭,是否能减少单侧TKR后的失血量和输血需求,来建立新的方案;(2)提出与临床应用相关的建议。
本研究于2014年9月至2016年6月进行,纳入95例拟行单侧骨水泥型TKR的原发性骨关节炎患者,为非随机回顾性研究。A组在止血带放气后松开引流管。B组在筋膜闭合后通过引流管向膝关节注射500mg氨甲环酸,并在最初30分钟夹闭引流管以防止渗漏。C组在术后最初3小时夹闭引流管。收集人口统计学特征和临床数据,包括血细胞比容(Hct)水平、总失血量(TBL)、引流出血量(BV)、输血量以及出现的任何并发症。
我们发现,与传统的负压引流组(A组)相比,IA-TXA注射组(B组)和3小时引流管夹闭组(C组)术后TBL、引流BV显著降低,Hct水平下降,输血量减少(p<0.001)。B组和C组之间无显著差异(p = 0.99)。
对于有静脉血栓栓塞并发症危险因素的患者,引流管夹闭方法可能比IA-TXA给药更安全。此外,对于TKR期间有高出血倾向或外侧支持带松解且担心术后伤口并发症的患者,IA-TXA给药可能比引流管夹闭更优。