Tenbensel Tim, Chalmers Linda, Jones Peter, Appleton-Dyer Sarah, Walton Lisa, Ameratunga Shanthi
Health Systems, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag, 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Nursing Development Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 26;17(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2617-1.
In 2009, the New Zealand government introduced a hospital emergency department (ED) target - 95% of patients seen, treated or discharged within 6 h - in order to alleviate crowding in public hospital EDs. While these targets were largely met by 2012, research suggests that such targets can be met without corresponding overall reductions in ED length-of-stay (LOS). Our research explores whether the NZ ED time target actually reduced ED LOS, and if so, how and when.
We adopted a mixed-methods approach with integration of data sources. After selecting four hospitals as case study sites, we collected all ED utilisation data for the period 2006 to 2012. ED LOS data was derived in two forms-reported ED LOS, and total ED LOS - which included time spent in short-stay units. This data was used to identify changes in the length of ED stay, and describe the timing of these changes to these indicators. Sixty-eight semi-structured interviews and two surveys of hospital clinicians and managers were conducted between 2011 and 2013. This data was then explored to identify factors that could account for ED LOS changes and their timing.
Reported ED LOS reduced in all sites after the introduction of the target, and continued to reduce in 2011 and 2012. However, total ED LOS only decreased from 2008 to 2010, and did not reduce further in any hospital. Increased use of short-stay units largely accounted for these differences. Interview and survey data showed changes to improve patient flow were introduced in the early implementation period, whereas increased ED resources, better information systems to monitor target performance, and leadership and social marketing strategies mainly took throughout 2011 and 2012 when total ED LOS was not reducing.
While the ED target clearly stimulated improvements in patient flow, our analysis also questions the value of ED targets as a long term approach. Increased use of short-stay units suggests that the target became less effective in 'standing for' improved timeliness of hospital care in response to increasing acute demand. As such, the overall challenges in managing demand for acute and urgent care in New Zealand hospitals remain.
2009年,新西兰政府出台了一项医院急诊科目标——95%的患者在6小时内就诊、治疗或出院——以缓解公立医院急诊科的拥挤状况。虽然到2012年这些目标基本实现,但研究表明,实现这些目标并不一定会相应地缩短急诊科的住院时间(LOS)。我们的研究探讨了新西兰急诊科时间目标是否真的缩短了急诊科住院时间,如果是,是如何以及何时缩短的。
我们采用了混合方法,整合了数据源。在选择了四家医院作为案例研究地点后,我们收集了2006年至2012年期间所有急诊科的使用数据。急诊科住院时间数据以两种形式得出——报告的急诊科住院时间和总急诊科住院时间——其中包括在短期住院病房的时间。这些数据用于确定急诊科住院时间的变化,并描述这些指标变化的时间。2011年至2013年期间,对医院临床医生和管理人员进行了68次半结构化访谈和两项调查。然后对这些数据进行研究,以确定可能导致急诊科住院时间变化及其时间的因素。
目标实施后,所有地点报告的急诊科住院时间均有所减少,并在2011年和2012年继续减少。然而,总急诊科住院时间仅在2008年至2010年有所下降,此后任何一家医院都没有进一步减少。短期住院病房使用的增加在很大程度上解释了这些差异。访谈和调查数据显示,在实施初期引入了改善患者流程的措施,而增加急诊科资源、更好的监测目标绩效的信息系统以及领导和社会营销策略主要在2011年和2012年实施,当时总急诊科住院时间并未减少。
虽然急诊科目标显然促进了患者流程的改善,但我们的分析也对急诊科目标作为一种长期方法的价值提出了质疑。短期住院病房使用的增加表明,随着急性需求的增加,该目标在代表提高医院护理及时性方面变得不那么有效。因此,新西兰医院管理急性和紧急护理需求的总体挑战依然存在。