Biophysics Unit, Department of Oncology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Laboratory of Biology and Treatment of Metastasis, Department of Oncology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 1;77(23):6759-6769. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1099. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
The margin for optimizing polychemotherapy is wide, but a quantitative comparison of current and new protocols is rare even in preclinical settings. reconstruction of the proliferation process and the main perturbations induced by treatment provides insight into the complexity of drug response and grounds for a more objective rationale to treatment schemes. We analyzed 12 treatment groups in trial on an ovarian cancer xenograft, reproducing current therapeutic options for this cancer including one-, two-, and three-drug schemes of cisplatin (DDP), bevacizumab (BEV), and paclitaxel (PTX) with conventional and two levels ("equi" and "high") of dose-dense schedules. All individual tumor growth curves were decoded via separate measurements of cell death and other antiproliferative effects, gaining fresh insight into the differences between treatment options. Single drug treatments were cytostatic, but only DDP and PTX were also cytotoxic. After treatment, regrowth stabilized with increased propensity to quiescence, particularly with BEV. More cells were killed by PTX dose-dense-equi than with PTX conventional, but with the addition of DDP, cytotoxicity was similar and considerably less than expected from that of individual drugs. In the DDP/PTX dose-dense-high scheme, both cell death and regrowth impairment were intensified enough to achieve complete remission, and addition of BEV increased cell death in all schemes. The results support the option for dose-dense PTX chemotherapy with active single doses, showing the relative additional contribution of BEV, but also indicate negative drug interactions in concomitant DDP/PTX treatments, suggesting that sequential schedules could improve antitumor efficacy. .
优化联合化疗的空间很大,但即使在临床前环境中,也很少对当前和新方案进行定量比较。重建增殖过程和治疗引起的主要干扰为药物反应的复杂性提供了深入了解,并为更客观的治疗方案提供了依据。我们分析了卵巢癌异种移植试验中的 12 个治疗组,重现了目前治疗这种癌症的选择,包括顺铂(DDP)、贝伐单抗(BEV)和紫杉醇(PTX)的单药、两药和三药方案,以及常规和两种剂量密集方案(“等剂量”和“高剂量”)。通过单独测量细胞死亡和其他抗增殖作用,对所有个体肿瘤生长曲线进行解码,从而深入了解治疗选择之间的差异。单一药物治疗具有细胞抑制作用,但只有 DDP 和 PTX 也具有细胞毒性。治疗后,随着静止倾向的增加,肿瘤重新生长稳定,尤其是 BEV 治疗。与常规 PTX 相比,PTX 等剂量密集方案中更多的细胞被杀死,但加入 DDP 后,细胞毒性相似,远低于单个药物的预期。在 DDP/PTX 高剂量密集方案中,细胞死亡和肿瘤生长抑制都得到了足够的强化,以实现完全缓解,并且在所有方案中,BEV 都增加了细胞死亡。结果支持使用活性单剂量进行密集 PTX 化疗的选择,显示了 BEV 的相对额外贡献,但也表明在同时使用 DDP/PTX 治疗时存在药物相互作用的负面影响,这表明序贯方案可能会提高抗肿瘤疗效。