• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存的预后因素

The Prognostic Factors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Chalieopanyarwong Virote, Attawettayanon Worapat, Kanchanawanichkul Watid, Pripatnanont Choosak

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Email:

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Sep 27;18(9):2555-2559. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.9.2555.

DOI:10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.9.2555
PMID:28952300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5720666/
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate outcomes, biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and to identify parameters influencing BCRFS of radical prostatectomy (RP) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in a single-institution. Methods: A retrospective review of prostate cancer (PC) patients received RP was identified from the medical records. Data was collected from 2007 to 2016. 178 patients received RP were enrolled in a study. These patients were evaluated on efficacy of RP by using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to analyze BCRFS and compared with Gleason score, pathologic staging, margin status and lymph node status with BCRFS. Results: The median follow up was 32.5 months (n = 178). Sixty-nine patients had extracapsular extension on pathologic results whereas 93 patients were classified as a high risk group. The median time for biochemical recurrence (BCR) was 22.3 months. The 3-year BCRFS in patients with a Gleason score 6, 3+4, 4+3, 8 and 9-10 were 85.8%, 84.6%, 78.7%, 53.3% and 35.8% . Multivariate analysis showed that extracapsular extension was independently associated with BCRFS. Conclusions: New group grading system indicates impact on BCRFS on univariate analysis but show negative impact on a multivariate Cox regression, only pathologic staging was independently associated with the cancer control outcome.

摘要

目的

在单一机构中评估根治性前列腺切除术(RP)及双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术的疗效、无生化复发生存率(BCRFS),并确定影响BCRFS的参数。方法:从病历中回顾性分析接受RP的前列腺癌(PC)患者。收集2007年至2016年的数据。178例接受RP的患者纳入研究。通过前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)分析BCRFS来评估这些患者RP的疗效,并将其与Gleason评分、病理分期、切缘状态及淋巴结状态与BCRFS进行比较。结果:中位随访时间为32.5个月(n = 178)。69例患者病理结果显示有包膜外侵犯,93例患者被归类为高危组。生化复发(BCR)的中位时间为22.3个月。Gleason评分为6、3 + 4、4 + 3、8和9 - 10的患者3年BCRFS分别为85.8%、84.6%、78.7%、53.3%和35.8%。多因素分析显示包膜外侵犯与BCRFS独立相关。结论:新的分组分级系统在单因素分析中显示对BCRFS有影响,但在多因素Cox回归中显示为负面影响,只有病理分期与癌症控制结局独立相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1832/5720666/04e3cb341874/APJCP-18-2555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1832/5720666/04e3cb341874/APJCP-18-2555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1832/5720666/04e3cb341874/APJCP-18-2555-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Prognostic Factors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存的预后因素
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Sep 27;18(9):2555-2559. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.9.2555.
2
Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的中期癌症控制结果:一项多机构分析。
World J Urol. 2016 Oct;34(10):1357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1781-y. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
4
Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):271-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11317.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
5
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者前列腺特异性抗原持续升高的预测因素及肿瘤学结局
J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31.
6
Extent of extraprostatic extension independently influences biochemical recurrence-free survival: evidence for further pT3 subclassification.前列腺外扩展程度独立影响无生化复发生存率:进一步进行pT3亚分类的证据。
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.025. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
7
Long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for pT3bN0M0 prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.在前列腺特异性抗原时代,对pT3bN0M0前列腺癌行根治性前列腺切除术及双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的长期癌症控制。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Feb;32(2):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
8
Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌单纯根治性前列腺切除术后临床及病理因素与前列腺特异性抗原水平升高的相关性
Urology. 1996 Aug;48(2):249-60. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00167-7.
9
Conditional biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的条件性无生化复发生存率
Prostate Int. 2020 Dec;8(4):173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.对于具有不良病理特征的前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术后辅助放疗可改善生化结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic significance of a novel indicator (PSA/PSA) for PSA recurrence in patients after radical prostatectomy.一种新型指标(PSA/PSA)对前列腺癌根治术后患者PSA复发的预后意义。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jun 25;11:5777-5783. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S197521. eCollection 2019.
2
Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.Gleason 5级是腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的一种可能的病理预测指标。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):783-788. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.783.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical significance of the prostate-specific antigen doubling time prior to and following radical prostatectomy to predict the outcome of prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术前和术后前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间对预测前列腺癌预后的临床意义。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;6(2):249-254. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.1116. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Discord Among Radiation Oncologists and Urologists in the Postoperative Management of High-Risk Prostate Cancer.放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生在高危前列腺癌术后管理中的分歧
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;41(8):739-746. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000381.
3
Predictive factors of late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发延迟的预测因素。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;47(3):233-238. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw181.
4
Oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy for patients with pT4 prostate cancer.pT4期前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学结局。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1091-1098. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0290.
5
Very Early Salvage Radiotherapy Improves Distant Metastasis-Free Survival.极早期挽救性放疗可改善无远处转移生存期。
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):662-668. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.106. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第二部分:复发、转移和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):630-642. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Long-term Impact of Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in pT3N0 Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Multi-institutional Series.根治性前列腺切除术治疗 pT3N0 前列腺癌患者中辅助与早期挽救性放疗的长期影响:多机构系列研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):886-893. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
8
Oncologic Outcome of Radical Prostatectomy as Monotherapy for Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer.根治性前列腺切除术作为高危前列腺癌男性单一疗法的肿瘤学结局
Curr Urol. 2016 May;9(2):67-72. doi: 10.1159/000442856. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.癌症治疗和生存统计,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
10
Radical Prostatectomy in Korean Men Aged 75-Years or Older: Safety and Efficacy in Comparison with Patients Aged 65-69 Years.75岁及以上韩国男性的根治性前列腺切除术:与65-69岁患者相比的安全性和有效性
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jun;31(6):957-62. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.957. Epub 2016 Apr 25.