Wu Lin, Li Huijun, Tang Tianle
School of Tropical and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571101, China.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2017 Jan 24;4(1):6. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering4010006.
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer substrates of sortase A are too expensive to be used to roughly screen high-throughput sortase A inhibitors. This makes therapeutic strategies difficult to realize in a clinical therapeutic use. Instead, we design here an LPETG-EGFP (leucine, proline, glutamic, threonine and glycine-enhanced green fluorescence) protein displayed on a yeast surface as a substrate by adaptively reducing the cost. We do this by optimizing the induction conditions of sortase A expression in DE3(BL21) and catalyzing LPETG proteins, which are displayed on surface of . Different expression conditions of sortase A include: induction temperature (22 °C, 28 °C, 37 °C and 40 °C), induction time (4 h, 5 h, 6 h and 7 h) and induction concentration of isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside IPTG (0.25 mmol/L, 0.5 mmol/L, 1 mmol/L, and 2 mmol/L). The fluorescence change of the LPETG-EGFP protein on the surface of over time was detected by flow cytometry and fluorescence spectrophotometry, and then the sensitivities of the two methods were compared. Using berberine chloride as an inhibitor, the activity of sortase A was investigated with the substrates of LPETG-EGFP protein, and compared to Dabcyl-QALPETGEE-Edans. A high yield of sortase A was achieved by inducing 1.0 mmol/L IPTG at 28 °C for 6 h. The intensity of green fluorescence of substrates displayed on the yeast surface was increased over time, while the stability was decreased slightly. Both fluorescence spectrophotometery and flow cytometry were fit for detection because of their high sensitivity. We utilized two different substrates of sortase A to investigate sortase A activity, which resulted in the increase of fluorescence intensity with respect to the increased time of growth. However, the method with Dabcyl-QALPETGEE-Edans as its substrate was more robust. Thus, the method described in this paper is a simple and cheap method which is very suitable for high-throughput analysis, but the conventional method is much more sensitive. The method described in this paper is expected to lead to large-scale screening of sortase A inhibitors which can be used to decrease the risk of drug resistance development.
分选酶A的荧光共振能量转移底物过于昂贵,无法用于高通量筛选分选酶A抑制剂。这使得治疗策略在临床治疗应用中难以实现。相反,我们在此设计了一种展示在酵母表面的LPETG-EGFP(亮氨酸、脯氨酸、谷氨酸、苏氨酸和甘氨酸增强型绿色荧光)蛋白作为底物,通过适应性地降低成本来实现。我们通过优化DE3(BL21)中分选酶A表达的诱导条件以及催化展示在酵母表面的LPETG蛋白来做到这一点。分选酶A的不同表达条件包括:诱导温度(22℃、28℃、37℃和40℃)、诱导时间(4小时、5小时、6小时和7小时)以及异丙基-β-D-硫代半乳糖苷(IPTG)的诱导浓度(0.25 mmol/L、0.5 mmol/L、1 mmol/L和2 mmol/L)。通过流式细胞术和荧光分光光度法检测酵母表面LPETG-EGFP蛋白随时间的荧光变化,然后比较这两种方法的灵敏度。使用黄连素作为抑制剂,以LPETG-EGFP蛋白底物研究分选酶A的活性,并与Dabcyl-QALPETGEE-Edans进行比较。在28℃下用1.0 mmol/L IPTG诱导6小时可实现分选酶A的高产率。展示在酵母表面的底物的绿色荧光强度随时间增加,而稳定性略有下降。由于荧光分光光度法和流式细胞术灵敏度高,二者均适合检测。我们利用分选酶A的两种不同底物研究分选酶A的活性,结果荧光强度随生长时间增加而增强。然而,以Dabcyl-QALPETGEE-Edans为底物的方法更稳定。因此,本文所述方法是一种简单且廉价的方法,非常适合高通量分析,但传统方法更灵敏。本文所述方法有望用于大规模筛选分选酶A抑制剂,以降低耐药性产生的风险。