Xu Yankai, Liu Ruihua, Liu Chu, Cui Yuanshan, Gao Zhenli
Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China.
Department of Urology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medicine University, Yantai, China.
Int Neurourol J. 2017 Sep;21(3):212-219. doi: 10.5213/inj.1734934.467. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron add-on therapy to solifenacin for patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
We conducted a systematic literature review to identify all randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) of this combination (mirabegron and solifenacin) for OAB. Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. A manual search was also performed to investigate relevant references from the retrieved studies.
Four publications describing 5 RCTs that compared combination therapy with solifenacin, including a total of 3,309 patients, were analyzed. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours (mean difference [MD], -0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.65 to -0.26; P<0.00001), number of episodes of incontinence per 24 hours (MD, -0.71; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.02; P=0.04), volume voided per micturition, and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours demonstrated that combination therapy was more effective than solifenacin therapy alone. Safety assessments, including common treatment-emergent adverse events (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95-1.27; P=0.23) and discontinuations due to adverse events (P=0.30), demonstrated that the combination therapy was well tolerated.
This meta-analysis suggests that mirabegron therapy as an add-on to solifenacin provides a satisfactory therapeutic effect for OAB symptoms with a low occurrence of side effects.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估米拉贝隆联合索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者的疗效和安全性。
我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定所有关于这种联合用药(米拉贝隆和索利那新)治疗OAB的随机、双盲、对照试验(RCT)。检索了Embase、MEDLINE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。还进行了人工检索,以调查检索到的研究中的相关参考文献。
分析了4篇描述5项RCT的文献,这些RCT比较了联合治疗与索利那新治疗,共纳入3309例患者。每24小时平均排尿次数(平均差[MD],-0.45;95%置信区间[CI],-0.65至-0.26;P<0.00001)、每24小时尿失禁发作次数(MD,-0.71;95%CI,-0.14至-0.02;P=0.04)、每次排尿量以及每24小时尿急发作次数表明,联合治疗比单独使用索利那新治疗更有效。安全性评估包括常见的治疗中出现的不良事件(比值比,1.09;95%CI,0.95 - 1.27;P=0.23)和因不良事件导致的停药率(P=0.30),表明联合治疗耐受性良好。
这项荟萃分析表明,米拉贝隆联合索利那新治疗对OAB症状具有令人满意的治疗效果,且副作用发生率较低。