Curila K, Smida J, Herman D, Osmancik P, Stros P, Zdarska J, Prochazkova R, Widimsky P
Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 50, 100 34, Prague, Czech Republic.
Herz. 2019 Feb;44(1):56-59. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4627-5. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Most outpatient follow-ups after pacemaker implantation do not involve changes in the device settings. Moreover, the need for pacemaker reprogramming declines with time after implantation. Currently, data on the need for changes in pacemaker set-up after replacement owing to battery depletion are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the rates of pacemaker reprogramming in this patient group.
A retrospective analysis was performed using the files of 217 patients who had undergone pacemaker replacement between 2002 and 2005. The data of 1,407 outpatient follow-up visits between 2002 and 2015 were analyzed. Scheduled and unscheduled visits were marked as visits with "action" or visits "without action", depending on whether pacemaker programming was or was not performed, respectively.
Pacemaker programming was performed in only 53 (4%) of the 1,234 scheduled visits and in 44 (25%) of 173 unscheduled visits. Thus, only 97 (7%) of 1,407 visits involved changes in device settings. Of these visits, 446 occurred in the first year after device replacement. The rate of unscheduled visits in the first year was higher (17%) than during the overall period (12%), but the rate of visits involving action was the same: 6% (26 of 446, first year) compared with 7% (97 of 1,407).
The vast majority of outpatient visits after pacemaker replacement do not involve subsequent device reprogramming during follow-up. This suggests the potential benefit of remote follow-up for these patients.
大多数起搏器植入后的门诊随访并不涉及设备设置的改变。此外,起搏器重新编程的需求在植入后会随时间下降。目前,缺乏关于因电池耗尽而更换起搏器后需要改变起搏器设置的数据。本研究的目的是确定该患者群体中起搏器重新编程的发生率。
对2002年至2005年间接受起搏器更换的217例患者的病历进行回顾性分析。分析了2002年至2015年间门诊随访的1407次数据。根据是否进行了起搏器编程,将定期和不定期随访分别标记为“有操作”或“无操作”的随访。
在1234次定期随访中,仅53次(4%)进行了起搏器编程,在173次不定期随访中有44次(25%)进行了编程。因此,在1407次随访中,只有97次(7%)涉及设备设置的改变。在这些随访中,446次发生在设备更换后的第一年。第一年不定期随访的发生率(17%)高于整个时间段(12%),但涉及操作的随访发生率相同:第一年为6%(446次中的26次),整个时间段为7%(1407次中的97次)。
起搏器更换后的绝大多数门诊随访在后续随访期间不涉及设备重新编程。这表明对这些患者进行远程随访可能有益。