Clinical Centre of Excellence for Body, Mind and Health, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Tranzo Department, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Department of Residency Training, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Centre for Mental Health Care, PsyQ Tilburg-Parnassia Groep, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018 Jan-Feb;50:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Collaborative care (CC) improves depressive symptoms in people with comorbid depressive disorder in chronic medical conditions, but its effect on physical symptoms has not yet systematically been reviewed. This study aims to do so.
Systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the European and US Clinical Trial Registers. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CC compared to care as usual (CAU), in primary care and general hospital setting, reporting on physical and depressive symptoms as outcomes. Overall treatment effects were estimated for illness burden, physical outcomes and depression, respectively.
Twenty RCTs were included, with N=4774 patients. The overall effect size of CC versus CAU for illness burden was OR 1.64 (95%CI 1.47;1.83), d=0.27 (95%CI 0.21;0.33). Best physical outcomes in CC were found for hypertension with comorbiddepression. Overall, depression outcomes were better for CC than for CAU. Moderator analyses did not yield statistically significant differences.
CC is more effective than CAU in terms of illness burden, physical outcomes and depression, in patients with comorbid depression in chronic medical conditions. More research covering multiple medical conditions is needed.
The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on February 19th 2016: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/DisplayPDF.php?ID=CRD42016035553.
协同护理(CC)可改善患有共病性抑郁障碍的慢性疾病患者的抑郁症状,但尚未系统地评价其对躯体症状的影响。本研究旨在对此进行评估。
采用系统评价和荟萃分析,检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、以及欧洲和美国临床试验注册中心。纳入的研究为 CC 与常规护理(CAU)对比的随机对照试验(RCT),研究对象为在初级保健和综合医院就诊、有躯体和抑郁症状的患者。分别评估疾病负担、躯体结局和抑郁的总体治疗效果。
共纳入 20 项 RCT,涉及 4774 例患者。CC 与 CAU 相比,疾病负担的总体效应量为 OR 1.64(95%CI 1.47;1.83),d=0.27(95%CI 0.21;0.33)。在患有共病性抑郁的高血压患者中,CC 的躯体结局最佳。总体而言,CC 的抑郁结局优于 CAU。亚组分析未显示出有统计学意义的差异。
CC 在疾病负担、躯体结局和抑郁方面优于 CAU,适用于患有慢性疾病共病性抑郁的患者。需要更多涵盖多种疾病的研究。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的方案已在 2016 年 2 月 19 日在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册:http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/DisplayPDF.php?ID=CRD42016035553。