Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department, centre hospitalier universitaire, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France; Unité visages U1228 Rennes 1, France.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department, centre hospitalier universitaire, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2017 Dec;47(5-6):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
To test the effect of gluteus medius (GM) vibration on the reduction of asymmetric body weight distribution in individuals with hemiparesis (HP) at two stages of postural recovery.
The effects of GM vibration according to the shift of the body weight (%Shift) onto the paretic leg during GM vibration were registered while standing on a force-platform in 40 HP (19 left and 21 right; mean age 54.7±10.6years, mean time after stroke 2.0±1.3months), as soon as they could stand without assistance and 4 to 6 weeks later, and in 40 control subjects (mean age 54.7±10.5years).
Without vibration, baseline body weight (BW) distribution was characterized by underloading of the paretic limb (mean BW on the paretic limb 37.2%±13.1%). At the early stage of balance recovery, % shift toward the paretic limb induced by GM vibration differed significantly between left and right HP (P=0.049) and between left HP and controls (C) (P=0.022) and was related to BW asymmetry (r=0.437, P=0.004). Later, GM vibration reduced asymmetric BW distribution in most HP and no difference was found between left and right HP and between left and C.
At an advanced stage of postural recovery, GM vibration could help encourage HP to put weight on the affected limb. Interestingly, a behavioral difference was initially observed between right and left HP that could probably be explained by a different strategy due to the baseline severity of the BW asymmetry.
测试臀中肌(GM)振动对偏瘫(HP)患者在姿势恢复的两个阶段减少非对称体重分布的影响。
在力台上站立时,记录 GM 振动时 GM 振动根据体重转移(%Shift)到患侧腿上的影响,40 名 HP(19 名左侧和 21 名右侧;平均年龄 54.7±10.6 岁,平均卒中后时间 2.0±1.3 个月),以及在他们能够在没有帮助的情况下站立后 4 至 6 周,以及 40 名对照受试者(平均年龄 54.7±10.5 岁)。
在没有振动的情况下,基线体重(BW)分布表现为患侧肢体的负重不足(患侧肢体的平均 BW 为 37.2%±13.1%)。在平衡恢复的早期阶段,GM 振动引起的患侧肢体的%Shift 在左侧和右侧 HP 之间(P=0.049)以及左侧 HP 和对照(C)之间(P=0.022)差异显著,与 BW 不对称性有关(r=0.437,P=0.004)。后来,GM 振动减少了大多数 HP 的非对称 BW 分布,左侧和右侧 HP 之间以及左侧和 C 之间没有差异。
在姿势恢复的晚期阶段,GM 振动可以帮助鼓励 HP 将体重放在患侧肢体上。有趣的是,最初在右侧和左侧 HP 之间观察到了行为差异,这可能是由于 BW 不对称的基线严重程度不同而导致的不同策略造成的。