文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

保乳乳头/皮肤切除术即刻乳房重建术患者边缘切缘接近时的良好转归:5 年随访。

Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Breast Unit, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of Plastic Surgery, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Balkan Med J. 2018 Jan 20;35(1):84-92. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0029. Epub 2017 Sep 29.


DOI:10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0029
PMID:28958980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5820453/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy has recently been reported to be the preferred type of surgery among breast-specific surgeons and plastic surgeons. AIMS: To explore the significant clinicopathological factors associated with long-term outcome related to local recurrences of the nipple among patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant after mastectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: From January 2007 to January 2013, 51 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant were retrospectively analysed. Patients' demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical outcome by disease-free survival and disease-specific survival analyses were determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 64 (31-114) months. Of the 57 mastectomies, 41 were skin sparing mastectomy (72%) and 16 were nipple-areola sparing mastectomy (28%). Immediate breast reconstruction surgery included tissue expander (n=46, 81%) or implant (n=11, 19%) placement. The molecular subgroups of 47 invasive cancers were as follows: luminal A (n=23, 49%), luminal B (n=16, 34%), non-luminal HER2 (n=5, 10.6), triple negative breast cancer (n=3, 6.4%). The 5-years disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 96.8%, 90%, and 97.6% respectively. Patients with luminal A cancer were found to have an improved 5-year disease-free survival time than other (luminal A; 100% vs. non-luminal A; 78%; p=0.028). Of the 14 nipple-areola sparing mastectomy, 13 had a close median tumour distance to nipple-areola complex (<20 mm) with a 5-year locoregional recurrence free survival of 100%. CONCLUSION: Immediate breast reconstruction with implant or tissue expander can be safely applied in patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy or nipple-areola sparing mastectomy. Patients with luminal-A type show the most favourable outcome. During the 5-year follow-up period, patients even with close margins (<20 mm) to nipple-areola complex with nipple-areola sparing mastectomy have excellent locoregional and overall survival when treated by contemporary multidisciplinary oncological management.

摘要

背景:乳房切除术 后采用植入物的乳房重建术最近被报道为乳腺专科医生和整形外科医生首选的手术类型。

目的:探讨与接受乳房切除术 后即刻使用组织扩张器或植入物进行乳房重建的患者乳头局部复发相关的长期结果相关的显著临床病理因素。

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。

方法:2007 年 1 月至 2013 年 1 月,对 51 例接受即刻乳房重建的乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析,使用组织扩张器或植入物。通过无病生存率和疾病特异性生存率分析确定患者的人口统计学数据、临床病理特征和临床结果。

结果:中位随访时间为 64(31-114)个月。57 例乳房切除术 中,41 例为保留皮肤的乳房切除术(72%),16 例为保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术(28%)。即刻乳房重建手术包括组织扩张器(n=46,81%)或植入物(n=11,19%)的放置。47 例浸润性癌的分子亚组如下:Luminal A(n=23,49%)、Luminal B(n=16,34%)、非 Luminal HER2(n=5,10.6%)、三阴性乳腺癌(n=3,6.4%)。5 年疾病特异性生存率、无病生存率和局部区域无复发生存率分别为 96.8%、90%和 97.6%。Luminal A 型癌症患者的 5 年无病生存率高于其他患者(Luminal A:100% vs.非 Luminal A:78%;p=0.028)。在 14 例保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术 中,有 13 例肿瘤与乳头乳晕复合体的中位距离较近(<20mm),5 年局部区域无复发生存率为 100%。

结论:即刻使用组织扩张器或植入物进行乳房重建可安全应用于接受保留皮肤或保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术患者。Luminal-A 型患者的预后最佳。在 5 年随访期间,即使接受保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术且肿瘤与乳头乳晕复合体的切缘较近(<20mm),通过当代多学科肿瘤管理治疗,患者也能获得极好的局部区域和总体生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/e8cf184140c0/BMJ-35-84-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/166b9891af27/BMJ-35-84-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/bfec052ca0fd/BMJ-35-84-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/e8cf184140c0/BMJ-35-84-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/166b9891af27/BMJ-35-84-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/bfec052ca0fd/BMJ-35-84-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f97a/5820453/e8cf184140c0/BMJ-35-84-g7.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up.

Balkan Med J. 2017-9-29

[2]
Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009-12

[3]
Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017-6

[4]
Nipple-sparing mastectomy as treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A 10-year follow-up study.

Breast J. 2018-5

[5]
Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy.

Arch Surg. 2008-1

[6]
The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - a Swedish matched cohort study.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014-10

[7]
[Oncological safety and prognosis factors analysis of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-complex sparing mastectomy].

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018-9-23

[8]
Surgical Delay of Nipple Areola Complex: A Powerful Technique to Extend the Indication of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2023-4

[9]
Oncologic outcomes and radiation safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Breast Cancer. 2019-3-19

[10]
Primary Buttonhole Mastopexy and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Preliminary Report.

Ann Plast Surg. 2016-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
Efficacy of breast reconstruction for N2-3M0 stage female breast cancer on breast cancer-specific survival: A population-based propensity score analysis.

Cancer Med. 2023-10

[2]
Spare the Nipple: A Systematic Review of Tumor Nipple-Distance and Oncologic Outcomes in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023-12

[3]
Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis.

J Med Life. 2022-2

[4]
Feasibility of modified radical mastectomy with nipple-areola preservation combined with stage I prosthesis implantation using air cavity-free suspension hook in patients with breast cancer.

World J Surg Oncol. 2021-4-10

[5]
Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction - early complications and outcomes of the treatment.

Prz Menopauzalny. 2020-9

[6]
Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less than 2.0 cm.

J Breast Cancer. 2019-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Expanding the Indications for Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Is It Safe for Patients with Locally Advanced Disease?

Ann Surg Oncol. 2016-1

[2]
Identification of a Low-Risk Luminal A Breast Cancer Cohort That May Not Benefit From Breast Radiotherapy.

J Clin Oncol. 2015-5-11

[3]
Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2014-10

[4]
Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution's experience.

Am J Surg. 2015-1

[5]
Sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: 20-year results of a randomized trial.

J Clin Oncol. 2014-2-3

[6]
Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases.

Breast J. 2014

[7]
Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience.

Ann Plast Surg. 2014-11

[8]
The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013-5

[9]
A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013-1

[10]
Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature.

Int J Surg Oncol. 2012

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索