Nguyen Steven M, Castrellon Aurelio, Vaidis Oliver, Johnson Andrew E
Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University.
Breast Cancer Center, Memorial Cancer Institute.
Cureus. 2017 Jul 25;9(7):e1511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1511.
Benefits of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have been well established in melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Immunotherapy agents such as ipilimumab (ipi) have recently demonstrated clinical efficacy in advanced disease as well. The theoretical synergistic effects of combining these therapies in MBM have not been explored in detail, however, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies that compared combined SRS and ipi versus SRS alone in MBM. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Central databases were used for our literature search, which was conducted by three reviewers. We included studies that examined SRS and ipilimumab compared to SRS alone in MBM. Pertinent results were tabulated in a standardized spreadsheet. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) Risk of Bias Assessment and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method for rating evidence quality were used for qualitative analysis. Review Manager was used for statistical analysis. We identified four cohort studies that compared SRS plus ipi versus SRS alone in MBM. As per the GRADE criteria, we found low-quality evidence for survival benefits associated with combined treatment. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant benefit in survival for SRS and ipilimumab (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.28 - 0.52, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between comparison groups for local control, distant brain control, radiation necrosis, or intracranial bleeding. We conclude that low-quality evidence exists for superior overall survival in MBM treated with SRS and ipilimumab compared to SRS without ipilimumab. There is also no increased risk of radiation necrosis and/or intracranial bleeding with combining radiation and immunotherapy in this setting.
立体定向放射外科(SRS)在黑色素瘤脑转移(MBM)中的益处已得到充分证实。免疫治疗药物如伊匹单抗(ipi)最近在晚期疾病中也显示出临床疗效。然而,尚未详细探讨在MBM中联合使用这些疗法的理论协同效应,因此,我们对比较SRS联合ipi与单独使用SRS治疗MBM的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们使用医学文献分析和检索系统在线(MEDLINE)和CENTRAL数据库进行文献检索,由三位审阅者进行。我们纳入了在MBM中比较SRS和伊匹单抗与单独使用SRS的研究。相关结果列于标准化电子表格中。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行偏倚风险评估,并采用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法对证据质量进行定性分析。使用Review Manager进行统计分析。我们确定了四项队列研究,比较了SRS加ipi与单独使用SRS治疗MBM的情况。根据GRADE标准,我们发现联合治疗与生存获益相关的证据质量较低。荟萃分析证实,SRS和伊匹单抗联合治疗在生存方面有显著益处(风险比0.38,95%置信区间0.28 - 0.52,p < 0.01)。在局部控制、远处脑控制、放射性坏死或颅内出血方面,比较组之间没有显著差异。我们得出结论,与不使用伊匹单抗的SRS相比,使用SRS和伊匹单抗治疗MBM的总体生存率更高的证据质量较低。在这种情况下,联合放疗和免疫治疗也不会增加放射性坏死和/或颅内出血的风险。