Hildebrandt Tom, Michaelides Andreas, Mackinnon Dianna, Greif Rebecca, DeBar Lynn, Sysko Robyn
Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
Noom, Inc., 229 W 28th Street, New York, 10001.
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Nov;50(11):1313-1322. doi: 10.1002/eat.22781. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Guided self-help treatments based on cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT-GSH) are efficacious for binge eating. With limited availability of CBT-GSH in the community, mobile technology offers a means to increase use of these interventions. The purpose of this study was to test the initial efficacy of Noom Monitor, a smartphone application designed to facilitate CBT-GSH (CBT-GSH + Noom), on study retention, adherence, and eating disorder symptoms compared to traditional CBT-GSH.
Sixty-six men and women with DSM-5 binge-eating disorder (BED) or bulimia nervosa (BN) were randomized to receive eight sessions of CBT-GSH + Noom (n = 33) or CBT-GSH (n = 33) over 12 weeks. Primary symptom outcomes were eating disorder examination objective bulimic episodes (OBEs), subjective bulimic episodes (SBEs), and compensatory behaviors. Assessments were collected at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 weeks. Behavioral outcomes were modeled using zero-inflated negative-binomial latent growth curve models with intent-to-treat.
There was a significant effect of treatment on change in OBEs (β = -0.84, 95% CI = -1.49, -0.19) favoring CBT-GSH + Noom. Remission rates were not statistically different between treatments for OBEs (β = -0.73, 95% CI = -1.86, 3.27; CBT-GSH-Noom = 17/27, 63.0% vs. CBT-GSH 11/27, 40.7%, NNT = 4.5), but CBT-GSH-Noom participants reported greater meal and snack adherence and regular meal adherence mediated treatment effects on OBEs. The treatments did not differ at the 6-month follow-up.
Smartphone applications for the treatment binge eating appear to have advantages for adherence, a critical component of treatment dissemination.
基于认知行为疗法的引导式自助治疗(CBT-GSH)对暴饮暴食有效。由于社区中CBT-GSH的可用性有限,移动技术提供了一种增加这些干预措施使用的方法。本研究的目的是测试一款旨在促进CBT-GSH的智能手机应用程序Noom Monitor(CBT-GSH + Noom)与传统CBT-GSH相比,在研究保留率、依从性和饮食失调症状方面的初始疗效。
66名患有DSM-5暴饮暴食症(BED)或神经性贪食症(BN)的男性和女性被随机分配,在12周内接受8次CBT-GSH + Noom治疗(n = 33)或CBT-GSH治疗(n = 33)。主要症状结果是饮食失调检查客观暴食发作(OBE)、主观暴食发作(SBE)和代偿行为。在第0、4、8、12、24和36周收集评估数据。行为结果采用意向性治疗的零膨胀负二项式潜在增长曲线模型进行建模。
治疗对OBE变化有显著影响(β = -0.84,95% CI = -1.49,-0.19),支持CBT-GSH + Noom。两种治疗方法在OBE缓解率上没有统计学差异(β = -0.73,95% CI = -1.86,3.27;CBT-GSH-Noom = 17/27,63.0% 对比 CBT-GSH 11/27,40.7%,NNT = 4.5),但CBT-GSH-Noom参与者报告在进餐和吃零食的依从性以及规律进餐依从性方面更高,这些因素介导了治疗对OBE的效果。两种治疗方法在6个月随访时没有差异。
用于治疗暴饮暴食的智能手机应用程序在依从性方面似乎具有优势,而依从性是治疗推广的关键组成部分。