Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy and EBMT Paris Office, Hôpital Saint-Antoine APHP, INSERM U 938, Université Pierre et Marie Curie UPMC, Paris, France.
Department of Oncology, University Hospital Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Am J Hematol. 2017 Dec;92(12):1318-1323. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24904. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia have a better outcome if reaching molecular remission. We compared the outcome of 373 patients autografted and 335 patients allografted with a 10/10 compatible unrelated donor in first molecular remission. Patients were stratified using the ELN European Leukemia Net classification. ELN favorable group: (234 auto and 70 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, the Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) was lower (3.7% versus 19%; P < 10 ), Relapse Incidence (RI) higher (29% versus 17%, P < 10 ), Leukemia Free Survival (LFS) identical (67% versus 64%) and Overall Survival (OS) better than in the allogeneic group (83% versus 62%; P = .008). By multivariate analysis, autologous transplantation was associated with a lower NRM (HR: 4, P = .01) and a better OS (HR: 2.08, P = .04). ELN intermediate group 1: (87 autologous and 172 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, NRM was lower (2.5% versus 11.8%; P = .03), RI higher (59% versus 18%, P < 10 ), LFS lower (39% versus 70%; P < 10 ) and OS lower than in the unrelated donor group (61% versus 74%; P = .005). By multivariate analysis, unrelated donor was superior to autologous transplantation for LFS (HR: 0.36, P < 10 and OS (HR: 0.53, P = .01). ELN intermediate group 2: (52 autologous and 93 unrelated donors). The outcome was identical. We conclude that good risk patients get higher benefit from autologous transplantation. Intermediate risk 2 patients have the same outcome and Intermediate risk 1 patients get higher benefit from unrelated donor transplants.
如果急性髓系白血病患者达到分子缓解,其预后会更好。我们比较了 373 例接受自体移植和 335 例接受 10/10 相容非亲缘供体异基因移植的处于首次分子缓解期患者的结果。患者使用欧洲白血病网(ELN)分类进行分层。ELN 预后良好组:(234 例自体和 70 例非亲缘移植)。单因素分析显示,在自体组中,非复发死亡率(NRM)较低(3.7%对 19%;P<0.01),复发率(RI)较高(29%对 17%;P<0.01),无白血病生存率(LFS)相同(67%对 64%),总生存率(OS)优于异基因组(83%对 62%;P=0.008)。多因素分析显示,自体移植与较低的 NRM 相关(HR:4,P=0.01)和更好的 OS(HR:2.08,P=0.04)。ELN 中危 1 组:(87 例自体和 172 例非亲缘移植)。单因素分析显示,在自体组中,NRM 较低(2.5%对 11.8%;P=0.03),RI 较高(59%对 18%;P<0.01),LFS 较低(39%对 70%;P<0.01),OS 低于非亲缘供体组(61%对 74%;P=0.005)。多因素分析显示,非亲缘供体在 LFS(HR:0.36,P<0.01)和 OS(HR:0.53,P=0.01)方面优于自体移植。ELN 中危 2 组:(52 例自体和 93 例非亲缘供体)。结果相同。我们得出结论,低危患者从自体移植中获益更高。中危 2 组患者的结果相同,而中危 1 组患者从非亲缘供体移植中获益更高。