Suppr超能文献

对于首次缓解期伴 NPM1 突变的成人孤立性急性髓系白血病患者行造血干细胞移植。

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with isolated NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

机构信息

Section of Hematology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT, Paris, France.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2019 Feb;94(2):231-239. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25355. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1) with isolated NPM1 mutation (iNPM1m) is considered a good prognosis genotype, although up to one-third relapse. To evaluate the best transplant strategy, we retrospectively compared autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), related (MSD), and fully matched unrelated (MUD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We identified 256 adult patients including 125 auto-SCT, 72 MSD, and 59 MUD. The 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 62% in auto-SCT, 69% in MUD, and 81% in MSD (P = .02 for MSD vs others). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was not different among auto-SCT, MUD, and MSD, reaching 83% (P = .88). The 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2.5% in auto-SCT and 7.5% in allo-SCT (P = .04). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was higher after auto-SCT (30%) than after MUD (22%) and MSD (12%, P = .01). In multivariate analysis, MSD versus auto-SCT but not MUD versus auto-SCT was associated with lower RI (P < .01 and P = .13, respectively) and better LFS (P = .01 and P = .31, respectively). Age correlated with higher NRM (P < .01). Allo-SCT using MSD appears as a reasonable transplant option for young patients with iNPM1m AML in CR1. Auto-SCT was followed by worse RI and LFS, but similar OS to both allo-SCT modalities.

摘要

伴有孤立性核仁磷酸蛋白 1 突变(iNPM1m)的初诊完全缓解(CR1)急性髓系白血病(AML)被认为是一种预后较好的基因型,尽管仍有三分之一的患者会复发。为了评估最佳的移植策略,我们回顾性比较了自体干细胞移植(auto-SCT)、亲缘(MSD)和完全匹配的无关供者(MUD)异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)。我们共纳入了 256 例成年患者,包括 125 例 auto-SCT、72 例 MSD 和 59 例 MUD。auto-SCT、MUD 和 MSD 的 2 年无白血病生存率(LFS)分别为 62%、69%和 81%(MSD 与其他组相比,P=0.02)。auto-SCT、MUD 和 MSD 的 2 年总生存率(OS)无差异,均为 83%(P=0.88)。auto-SCT 和 allo-SCT 的 2 年非复发死亡率(NRM)分别为 2.5%和 7.5%(P=0.04)。auto-SCT 后 2 年的累积复发率(RI)高于 MUD(30%比 22%,P=0.01)和 MSD(12%,P=0.01)。多因素分析显示,MSD 与 auto-SCT 相比(但 MUD 与 auto-SCT 相比并非如此),RI 较低(P<0.01 和 P=0.13),LFS 较好(P=0.01 和 P=0.31)。年龄与较高的 NRM 相关(P<0.01)。allo-SCT 采用 MSD 似乎是 CR1 伴有 iNPM1m AML 的年轻患者的一种合理移植选择。与 allo-SCT 相比,auto-SCT 后 RI 和 LFS 较差,但 OS 相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验