Division of Gastroenterology.
Department of Internal Medicine.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;53(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000928.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Noncompliance with physician and procedure appointments is associated with poor disease control and worse disease outcomes. This also impacts the quality of care, decreases efficiency, and affects revenue. Studies have shown that no-show rates are higher in clinics caring for underserved populations and may contribute to poorer health outcomes in this group.
We performed a 17-month retrospective observational cohort study of patients scheduled for outpatient procedures in the Gastroenterology endoscopy suite at the University of Florida Health, Jacksonville. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations between attendance and predictors of no-show.
In total, 6157 patients were scheduled to undergo different GI procedures during the study period. A total of 4388 (71%) patients completed their procedure, whereas 2349 (29%) failed to attend their appointment and were considered "no-show". There was a significant relationship between the visit attendance and race, insurance, gender, and marital status. Males had a higher no-show rate compared with females (30% vs. 28%; P<0.05). African Americans had the highest no-show rate (32%; P<0.05) amongst different races. Patients scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy (ie, history of polyps, IBD, Colon cancer) were more likely to show (78%) than those obtaining initial colorectal cancer screening (74%) or other indications (71%) (P<0.05).In the logistic regression model, patients with commercial insurance are more likely to show for their appointments than those with noncommercial insurance (eg, Medicare, Medicaid, City contract etc) [odds ratio (OR), 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2-3.0]. The odds of showing up are 1.7 times higher for married men compared with single men (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0). Similarly, married females are more likely to show up for appointment than single females (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). We did not find significant association between the type of GI procedure (eg, colonoscopy vs. esophagogastroduodenoscopy vs. advanced endoscopic procedures) (P>0.05).
Predictors of no-shows for endoscopic gastrointestinal procedures included unpartnered or single patients, African American race and noncommercial insurance providers. Patients scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy had better adherence than initial screening. Further studies are required to better characterize these factors and improve adherence to the outpatient appointments based on the identified predictors.
背景/目的:不遵守医生和程序预约与疾病控制不佳和预后更差有关。这也会影响护理质量,降低效率,并影响收入。研究表明,在为服务不足的人群提供服务的诊所中,未出现率更高,并且可能导致该人群的健康状况更差。
我们对在佛罗里达大学健康杰克逊维尔分校胃肠病学内镜套房接受门诊手术的患者进行了为期 17 个月的回顾性观察队列研究。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估出勤率与不出现的预测指标之间的关系。
在研究期间,共有 6157 名患者计划接受不同的 GI 手术。共有 4388 名(71%)患者完成了手术,而 2349 名(29%)未能参加预约,被视为“未出现”。就诊出勤率与种族,保险,性别和婚姻状况之间存在显著关系。与女性(30%比 28%; P<0.05)相比,男性的未出现率更高。在不同种族中,非裔美国人的未出现率最高(32%; P<0.05)。接受结肠镜检查监测(即息肉,IBD,结肠癌病史)的患者(78%)比初次接受结直肠癌筛查(74%)或其他适应症(71%)的患者更有可能就诊(P<0.05)。在逻辑回归模型中,有商业保险的患者比没有商业保险(例如,医疗保险,医疗补助,城市合同等)的患者更有可能预约就诊[优势比(OR),2.6;95%置信区间(CI),2.2-3.0]。与单身男性相比,已婚男性出现的几率高 1.7 倍(OR,1.7;95%CI,1.3-2.0)。同样,已婚女性比单身女性更有可能出现预约(OR,1.1;95%CI,0.9-1.3)。我们没有发现内镜胃肠病程序类型(例如结肠镜检查与食管胃十二指肠镜检查与先进的内镜程序)之间存在显著关联(P>0.05)。
内镜胃肠病程序未出现的预测因素包括无伴侣或单身患者,非裔美国人和非商业保险提供者。接受结肠镜检查监测的患者比初次筛查更能坚持治疗。需要进一步研究以更好地描述这些因素,并根据确定的预测因素提高对门诊预约的依从性。