Suppr超能文献

短信对门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备及预约就诊的影响:一项随机临床试验

Effect of Text Messaging on Bowel Preparation and Appointment Attendance for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Mahmud Nadim, Asch David A, Sung Jessica, Reitz Catherine, Coniglio Mary S, McDonald Caitlin, Bernard Donna, Mehta Shivan J

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034553. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34553.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Outpatient colonoscopy is important for colorectal cancer screening. However, nonadherence and poor bowel preparation are common.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an automated text messaging intervention with a focus on informational and reminder functions could improve attendance rates and bowel preparation quality for outpatient colonoscopy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in an endoscopy center at an urban academic medical center. Adult patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy between January and September 2019 were enrolled by telephone call (early phase) or by automated text message (late phase). Data were analyzed from October 2019 to January 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

After enrollment, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to usual care (ie, written instructions and nurse telephone call) or to the intervention (ie, usual care plus an automated series of 9 educational or reminder text messages in the week prior to scheduled colonoscopy).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was appointment attendance rate with good or excellent bowel preparation. Secondary outcomes included appointment attendance rate, bowel preparation quality (poor or inadequate, fair or adequate, and good or excellent), and cancellation lead time (in days).

RESULTS

Among 753 patients included and randomized in the trial (median [interquartile range] age, 56 [49-64] years; 364 [48.3%] men; 429 [57.2%] Black), 367 patients were randomized to the intervention group and 386 patients were randomized to the control group. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups (patients attending appointments with good or excellent bowel preparation: intervention, 195 patients [53.1%]; control, 210 patients [54.4%]; P = .73), including when stratified by early or late phase enrollment groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found no significant difference in appointment attendance or bowel preparation quality with an automated text messaging intervention compared with the usual care control. Future work could optimize the content and delivery of text message interventions or identify patient subgroups that may benefit from this approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03710213.

摘要

重要性

门诊结肠镜检查对结直肠癌筛查很重要。然而,不依从和肠道准备不佳的情况很常见。

目的

确定以信息和提醒功能为重点的自动短信干预是否能提高门诊结肠镜检查的就诊率和肠道准备质量。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验在一家城市学术医疗中心的内镜检查中心进行。2019年1月至9月安排进行门诊结肠镜检查的成年患者通过电话(早期阶段)或自动短信(后期阶段)进行招募。对2019年10月至2020年1月的数据进行了分析。

干预措施

入组后,患者按1:1的比例随机分为常规护理组(即书面说明和护士电话)或干预组(即常规护理加上在预定结肠镜检查前一周自动发送的一系列9条教育或提醒短信)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是肠道准备良好或优秀的预约就诊率。次要结局包括预约就诊率、肠道准备质量(差或不足、一般或充足、良好或优秀)以及取消提前期(天数)。

结果

在纳入试验并随机分组的753例患者中(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为56[49 - 64]岁;男性364例[48.3%];黑人429例[57.2%]),367例患者被随机分配到干预组,386例患者被随机分配到对照组。两组之间的主要结局没有显著差异(肠道准备良好或优秀的就诊患者:干预组195例[53.1%];对照组210例[54.4%];P = 0.73),按早期或后期入组分层时也是如此。同样,次要结局也没有显著差异。

结论和相关性

这项随机临床试验发现,与常规护理对照相比,自动短信干预在预约就诊率或肠道准备质量方面没有显著差异。未来的工作可以优化短信干预的内容和发送方式,或确定可能从这种方法中受益的患者亚组。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03710213。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5fe/7835713/1c126f628897/jamanetwopen-e2034553-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验