Hansen E Matthew, Munson A Steven, Blackford Darren C, Graves Andrew D, Coleman Tom W, Baggett L Scott
US-Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 860 North 1200 East, Logan, UT 84321.
US-Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, 4746 South 1900 East, Ogden, UT 84403.
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Oct 1;110(5):2140-2148. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox208.
We tested 3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH) and an Acer kairomone blend (AKB) as repellent semiochemicals for area and single tree protection to prevent spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) attacks at locations in Utah and New Mexico. In the area protection study, we compared host infestation rates of MCH applications at three densities (20, 40, and 80 g MCH ha-1) against a control treatment over 0.64 ha plots centered within ~1.25 ha treatment blocks. All treatments included two baited funnel traps within the plot to assure spruce beetle pressure. Following beetle attack, plots were surveyed for new spruce beetle attacks and to quantify stand characteristics. The probability of more severe spruce beetle attacks was significantly reduced, by ~50%, in each of the MCH area treatments compared with the control treatment but there was no significant treatment difference among the MCH deployment densities. For the single tree protection study, we compared attack rates of MCH, Acer kairomone blend (AKB), and MCH plus AKB on spruce beetle-baited trees against bait-only trees. Each treatment was applied over a range of host diameters to test for host size effects. Seventy-five percent of control trees were mass-attacked, about one-third of MCH- and AKB-alone spruce was mass-attacked, and no MCH plus AKB spruce were mass-attacked. These results suggest that MCH alone is a marginal area and single tree protectant against spruce beetle but that deployment with other repellents can significantly increase treatment efficacy.
我们测试了3-甲基环己-2-烯-1-酮(MCH)和一种槭树利它素混合物(AKB)作为驱避性信息化合物,用于区域和单株树木保护,以防止云杉甲虫(Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby)在犹他州和新墨西哥州的地点发动攻击。在区域保护研究中,我们在以约1.25公顷处理区为中心的0.64公顷样地内,将三种密度(20、40和80克MCH公顷-1)的MCH应用的寄主侵染率与对照处理进行了比较。所有处理在样地内都包括两个诱饵漏斗陷阱,以确保有云杉甲虫压力。在甲虫攻击后,对样地进行了新的云杉甲虫攻击调查,并对林分特征进行了量化。与对照处理相比,每个MCH区域处理中更严重的云杉甲虫攻击的概率显著降低了约50%,但MCH部署密度之间没有显著的处理差异。对于单株树木保护研究,我们比较了MCH、槭树利它素混合物(AKB)以及MCH加AKB在诱饵诱捕云杉甲虫的树木上的攻击率与仅设置诱饵的树木的攻击率。每个处理应用于一系列寄主直径范围,以测试寄主大小的影响。75%的对照树受到大规模攻击,单独使用MCH和AKB的云杉约有三分之一受到大规模攻击,而没有MCH加AKB的云杉受到大规模攻击。这些结果表明,单独使用MCH作为防止云杉甲虫的区域和单株树木保护剂效果一般,但与其他驱避剂一起使用可以显著提高处理效果。