Skagerberg G, Meister B, Hökfelt T, Lindvall O, Goldstein M, Joh T, Cuello A C
Department of Histology, University of Lund, Sweden.
Neuroscience. 1988 Feb;24(2):605-20. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(88)90354-5.
The morphology, number and distribution of catecholaminergic neurons, as visualized either with the aluminum-catalysed formaldehyde method for catecholamines or with the immunohistochemical method for the catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes tyrosine hydroxylase and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, respectively, were analysed within the rat dorsal hypothalamus, ventral thalamus and adjoining regions (A11 and A13 cell groups). Both polyclonal rabbit and monoclonal mouse tyrosine hydroxylase antibodies were used in elution-restaining and double-staining experiments, respectively. Some of the animals also received spinal injections of the fluorescent tracer True Blue in order to retrogradely label cells projecting to the spinal cord. With respect to the number and distribution of catecholaminergic neurons in the A11 and medial A13 cell groups, including the spinal-projecting subpopulation, the results obtained with the two methods were very similar, indicating that within these regions of the CNS the two methods in principle visualize identical cell populations. However, the catecholaminergic cells were distinctly larger and their processes appeared more extensive with the immunohistochemical method. Animals processed for immunohistochemistry exhibited a lower total number of retrogradely labelled cells in the A11 area than those analysed with aldehyde-induced fluorescence despite the fact that both methods revealed similar numbers of retrogradely labelled tyrosine hydroxylase-positive and catecholamine-containing cells, respectively. The reason for these discrepancies, which are probably of methodological nature, are discussed. While this study shows that the results obtained with the two methods within the A11 and medial A13 cell group are very similar and thus strengthens the earlier proposed concept of the organization of the diencephalospinal dopaminergic system, it also documents that in intermingling and nearby CNS regions there are cell bodies which cannot be demonstrated with the aldehyde fluorescence method, but which still contain tyrosine hydroxylase and/or aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase-like immunoreactivity. One explanation is low levels of enzyme and/or dopamine combined with a comparatively low sensitivity of the histochemical method. Thus, neurons containing both enzymes are probably dopaminergic, even if catecholamine fluorescence cannot be demonstrated. Neurons containing tyrosine hydroxylase, but lacking both aldehyde induced fluorescence and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, may also still be dopaminergic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
分别采用铝催化甲醛法检测儿茶酚胺以及免疫组化法检测儿茶酚胺合成酶酪氨酸羟化酶和芳香族L-氨基酸脱羧酶,对大鼠背侧下丘脑、腹侧丘脑及毗邻区域(A11和A13细胞群)内的儿茶酚胺能神经元的形态、数量和分布进行了分析。在洗脱保留和双重染色实验中,分别使用了兔多克隆抗体和小鼠单克隆酪氨酸羟化酶抗体。部分动物还接受了脊髓注射荧光示踪剂真蓝,以便逆行标记投射至脊髓的细胞。关于A11和内侧A13细胞群(包括投射至脊髓的亚群)中儿茶酚胺能神经元的数量和分布,两种方法所得结果非常相似,表明在中枢神经系统的这些区域,这两种方法原则上可显示相同的细胞群。然而,免疫组化法显示儿茶酚胺能细胞明显更大,其突起也更广泛。尽管两种方法分别显示出数量相似的逆行标记酪氨酸羟化酶阳性细胞和含儿茶酚胺细胞,但接受免疫组化处理的动物在A11区域中逆行标记细胞的总数低于采用醛诱导荧光法分析的动物。本文讨论了这些差异的原因,这些差异可能具有方法学性质。虽然本研究表明在A11和内侧A13细胞群中两种方法所得结果非常相似,从而强化了先前提出的间脑脊髓多巴胺能系统组织概念,但也证明在相互交织的附近中枢神经系统区域存在一些细胞体,醛荧光法无法显示这些细胞体,但它们仍含有酪氨酸羟化酶和/或芳香族L-氨基酸脱羧酶样免疫反应性。一种解释是酶和/或多巴胺水平较低,以及组织化学方法的灵敏度相对较低。因此,即使无法显示儿茶酚胺荧光,同时含有这两种酶的神经元可能仍是多巴胺能的。含有酪氨酸羟化酶但缺乏醛诱导荧光和芳香族L-氨基酸脱羧酶的神经元也可能仍是多巴胺能的。(摘要截取自400字)