Pagani Giorgio, Cali Giuseppe, Acharya Ganesh, Trisch Ilan-Timor, Palacios-Jaraquemada Jose, Familiari Alessandra, Buca Danilo, Manzoli Lamberto, Flacco Maria E, Fanfani Francesco, Liberati Marco, Scambia Giovanni, D'antonio Francesco
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arnas Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jan;97(1):25-37. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13238. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
Our objective was to elucidate the overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation (AIP).
Medline, Embase, CINAHL and The Cochrane databases were searched. The ultrasound signs explored were: loss of hypoechoic (clear) zone in the placental-uterine interface, placental lacunae, bladder wall interruption, myometrial thinning, focal exophitic mass, placental lacunar flow, subplacental vascularity, and uterovesical hypervascularity.
Twenty studies (3209 pregnancies) were included. Ultrasound had an overall good diagnostic accuracy in identifying the depth of placental invasion with sensitivities of 90.6%, 93.0%, 89.5%, and 81.2% for placenta accreta, increta, accreta/increta, and percreta, respectively; the corresponding specificities were 97.1%, 98.4%, 94.7%, and 98.9%. Placental lacunae had sensitivities of 74.8%, 88.6%, and 76.3% for the detection of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of loss of the clear zone in identifying placenta accreta were 74.9% and 92.0%, whereas the corresponding figures for placenta increta and percreta were 91.6% and 76.9%, and 88.1% and 71.1%. Lacunar flow had sensitivities of 81.2%, 84.3%, and 45.2% for the detection of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta respectively; the corresponding figures for specificity were 84.0%, 79.7%, and 75.3%. Sensitivity of uterovesical hypervascularity was low for the detection of placenta accreta (12.3%) but high for placenta increta (94.4%) and percreta (86.2%); the corresponding figures for specificity were 90.8%, 88.0% and 88.2%, respectively.
Ultrasound has an overall good diagnostic accuracy in recognizing the depth and the topography of placental invasion.
我们的目的是阐明超声在检测异常侵入性胎盘(AIP)严重程度方面的总体诊断准确性。
检索了Medline、Embase、CINAHL和Cochrane数据库。所探究的超声征象包括:胎盘 - 子宫界面低回声(清晰)区消失、胎盘腔隙、膀胱壁中断、子宫肌层变薄、局灶性外生性肿块、胎盘腔隙血流、胎盘下血管形成以及子宫膀胱血管增多。
纳入了20项研究(3209例妊娠)。超声在识别胎盘侵入深度方面总体诊断准确性良好,对于胎盘粘连、胎盘植入、胎盘粘连/植入以及穿透性胎盘植入,其敏感性分别为90.6%、93.0%、89.5%和81.2%;相应的特异性分别为97.1%、98.4%、94.7%和98.9%。胎盘腔隙对于检测胎盘粘连、胎盘植入和穿透性胎盘植入的敏感性分别为74.8%、88.6%和76.3%。低回声区消失在识别胎盘粘连时的敏感性和特异性分别为74.9%和92.0%,而对于胎盘植入和穿透性胎盘植入,相应数字分别为91.6%和76.9%,以及88.1%和71.1%。腔隙血流对于检测胎盘粘连、胎盘植入和穿透性胎盘植入的敏感性分别为81.2%、84.3%和45.2%;相应的特异性数字分别为84.0%、79.7%和75.3%。子宫膀胱血管增多对于检测胎盘粘连的敏感性较低(12.3%),但对于胎盘植入(94.4%)和穿透性胎盘植入(86.2%)较高;相应的特异性数字分别为90.8%、88.0%和88.2%。
超声在识别胎盘侵入的深度和形态方面总体诊断准确性良好。