Suppr超能文献

将公共医疗保险覆盖范围扩大至包括验光师进行糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的成本效用分析。

Cost-Utility Analysis of Extending Public Health Insurance Coverage to Include Diabetic Retinopathy Screening by Optometrists.

作者信息

van Katwyk Sasha, Jin Ya-Ping, Trope Graham E, Buys Yvonne, Masucci Lisa, Wedge Richard, Flanagan John, Brent Michael H, El-Defrawy Sherif, Tu Hong Anh, Thavorn Kednapa

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of vision loss and blindness in Canada. Eye examinations play an important role in early detection. However, DR screening by optometrists is not always universally covered by public or private health insurance plans. This study assessed whether expanding public health coverage to include diabetic eye examinations for retinopathy by optometrists is cost-effective from the perspective of the health care system.

METHODS

We conducted a cost-utility analysis of extended coverage for diabetic eye examinations in Prince Edward Island to include examinations by optometrists, not currently publicly covered. We used a Markov chain to simulate disease burden based on eye examination rates and DR progression over a 30-year time horizon. Results were presented as an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A series of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Extending public health coverage to eye examinations by optometrists was associated with higher costs ($9,908,543.32) and improved QALYs (156,862.44), over 30 years, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1668.43/QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the most influential determinants of the results were the cost of optometric screening and selected utility scores. At the commonly used threshold of $50,000/QALY, the probability that the new policy was cost-effective was 99.99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending public health coverage to eye examinations by optometrists is cost-effective based on a commonly used threshold of $50,000/QALY. Findings from this study can inform the decision to expand public-insured optometric services for patients with diabetes.

摘要

背景

糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是加拿大视力丧失和失明的主要原因之一。眼部检查在早期检测中起着重要作用。然而,验光师进行的DR筛查并不总是被公共或私人医疗保险计划普遍覆盖。本研究从医疗保健系统的角度评估了扩大公共卫生覆盖范围以包括验光师进行的糖尿病视网膜病变眼部检查是否具有成本效益。

方法

我们对爱德华王子岛糖尿病眼部检查的扩大覆盖范围进行了成本效用分析,以包括目前未被公共覆盖的验光师检查。我们使用马尔可夫链根据30年时间范围内的眼部检查率和DR进展来模拟疾病负担。结果以每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本表示。进行了一系列单因素和概率敏感性分析。

结果

在30年期间,将公共卫生覆盖范围扩大到验光师进行的眼部检查与更高的成本(9,908,543.32加元)和改善的QALY(156,862.44)相关,导致每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比为1,668.43加元。敏感性分析表明,结果的最有影响力的决定因素是验光筛查成本和选定的效用评分。在常用的50,000加元/QALY阈值下,新政策具有成本效益的概率为99.99%。

结论

根据常用的50,000加元/QALY阈值,将公共卫生覆盖范围扩大到验光师进行的眼部检查具有成本效益。本研究的结果可为扩大糖尿病患者公共保险验光服务的决策提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验