• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于学校的身体活动干预对少女有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Physical Activity and Health Research Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK.

Physical Activity and Health Research Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.018
PMID:28964852
Abstract

Physical activity (PA) decreases during the transition from childhood to adolescence, with larger declines observed in girls. School-based interventions are considered the most promising approach for increasing adolescents' PA levels although, it is unclear which types of school-based interventions have the greatest impact. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the impact and design of school-based PA interventions targeting adolescent girls. A systematic search was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus and PsychInfo). This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42016037428) and PRISMA guidelines (2009) were followed throughout. Twenty studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria and were included in a narrative synthesis. Seventeen studies were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. There was a significant small positive treatment effect for school-based PA interventions for adolescent girls (k=17, g=0.37, p<0.05). After an outlier was removed (residual z=7.61) the average treatment effect was significantly reduced, indicating a very small positive effect (k=16, g=0.07, p=0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed very small significant effects for multi-component interventions (k=7, g=0.09, p<0.05), interventions underpinned by theory (k=12, g=0.07, p<0.05), and studies with a higher risk of bias (k=13, g=0.09, p<0.05). Intervention effects were very small which indicates that changing PA behaviors in adolescent girls through school-based interventions is challenging. Multi-component interventions and interventions underpinned by theory may be the most effective approaches to positively change adolescent girls' PA.

摘要

体力活动(PA)在儿童期向青春期过渡期间减少,女孩的下降幅度更大。基于学校的干预措施被认为是提高青少年 PA 水平的最有希望的方法,尽管尚不清楚哪种类型的基于学校的干预措施具有最大的影响。本系统评价的目的是评估针对青春期女孩的基于学校的 PA 干预措施的影响和设计。使用四个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus 和 PsychInfo)进行了系统搜索。本系统评价在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42016037428)中进行了注册,并在整个过程中遵循了 PRISMA 指南(2009 年)。有 20 项研究符合纳入标准,并被纳入叙述性综合分析。有 17 项研究符合纳入荟萃分析的标准。对于针对青春期女孩的基于学校的 PA 干预措施,有一个显著的小的积极治疗效果(k=17,g=0.37,p<0.05)。在去除一个异常值(残差 z=7.61)后,平均治疗效果显著降低,表明效果非常小(k=16,g=0.07,p=0.05)。亚组分析显示,多组分干预(k=7,g=0.09,p<0.05)、基于理论的干预(k=12,g=0.07,p<0.05)和高偏倚风险的研究(k=13,g=0.09,p<0.05)的效果非常小,具有显著意义。干预效果非常小,这表明通过基于学校的干预措施改变青春期女孩的 PA 行为具有挑战性。多组分干预和基于理论的干预可能是积极改变青春期女孩 PA 的最有效方法。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于学校的身体活动干预对少女有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
3
Interventions in outside-school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4 to 12 years.校外儿童保育环境中促进 4 至 12 岁学童身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;9(9):CD013380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013380.pub2.
4
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
5
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
9
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
10
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of affordances on physical literacy and quality of life: investigating the nonlinear approach of fundamental movement skills and a selection of handball sports skills.可供性对身体素养和生活质量的影响:探究基本运动技能和部分手球运动技能的非线性方法。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05916-x.
2
Health-related quality of life findings from the Faroe Islands FIT FIRST FOR ALL school-based physical activity study.法罗群岛“全民首重健康”学校体育活动研究中的健康相关生活质量研究结果。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jun 25;7:1533723. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1533723. eCollection 2025.
3
School-based peer education intervention on physical activity in Iranian adolescent girls: an application of the theory of planned behavior.
基于学校的同伴教育干预对伊朗青春期女孩身体活动的影响:计划行为理论的应用
Front Public Health. 2025 May 7;13:1558210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558210. eCollection 2025.
4
Findings from a cluster randomised feasibility study of a school-based physical activity role model intervention (CHARMING) for 9-10-year-old girls.一项针对9至10岁女孩的基于学校的体育活动榜样干预(CHARMING)的整群随机可行性研究结果。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Apr 4;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01615-7.
5
Health promotion meets sustainable movement-based education in school-a "walking school" initiative in Sweden.健康促进与瑞典学校基于可持续运动的教育相结合——一项“步行上学”倡议。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf006.
6
Challenges and barriers in conducting school-based physical activity research: A narrative review.开展基于学校的体育活动研究的挑战与障碍:一项叙述性综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Oct;13(10):4154-4158. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_364_24. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
7
Technology-Supported Physical Activity and Its Potential as a Tool to Promote Young Women's Physical Activity and Physical Literacy: Systematic Review.技术支持的身体活动及其作为促进年轻女性身体活动和身体素养工具的潜力:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e52302. doi: 10.2196/52302.
8
The Influence of Family Adversities on Longitudinal Changes in Physical Inactivity Among Korean Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.《新冠疫情期间家庭逆境对韩国青少年身体活动纵向变化的影响》。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Sep;57(5):443-450. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.236. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
9
Remote physical activity intervention to promote physical activity and health in adolescent girls (the HERizon project): a multi-arm, pilot randomised trial.远程体力活动干预促进青春期女孩的体力活动和健康(HERizon 项目):一项多臂、先导随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 3;24(1):2098. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19664-7.
10
DE-PASS best evidence statement (BESt): determinants of adolescents' device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour in settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.DE-PASS 最佳证据陈述(BESt):环境中青少年基于设备的身体活动和久坐行为的决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):1706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19136-y.