Krekeler Brittany N, Broadfoot Courtney K, Johnson Stephen, Connor Nadine P, Rogus-Pulia Nicole
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Medical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, 1300 University Avenue, Room 483, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 1975 Willow Drive, 361 Goodnight Hall, Scott H, Madison, WI, 53706-1103, USA.
Dysphagia. 2018 Apr;33(2):173-184. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9852-9. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
Patient adherence to treatment recommendations is an important issue for healthcare providers, in a multitude of specialties, and is critical when assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of a particular treatment approach. Patients who have swallowing impairment often require complex and specific interventions requiring altered daily patterns of behavior. Patients with dysphagia who do not follow recommendations or prescribed exercises may not receive maximum benefit of an intervention. Poor adherence also makes it more difficult to evaluate efficacy of a treatment both clinically and in experimental settings. Further, swallow safety can be compromised if certain recommendations are not followed. Our purpose was to systematically review the literature to understand what is known about adherence within the field of dysphagia treatment. We systematically identified 12 studies that tracked and reported patient-specific adherence. In this review, we found that the average adherence rate from these studies ranges between 21.9 and 51.9%. Adherence to prophylactic treatment recommendations for patients with head and neck cancer was the focus in 9/12 studies. The findings of this review identify a large gap in knowledge regarding adherence to dysphagia treatment. Few studies account for adherence within their study designs. When planning dysphagia treatment studies, it is imperative that investigators include information regarding patient adherence to accurately interpret findings. Given the variable adherence rates found in this review, factors influencing patient adherence with dysphagia treatments should be identified to increase adherence in future trials.
患者对治疗建议的依从性是众多专业领域的医疗服务提供者面临的一个重要问题,在评估特定治疗方法的疗效和有效性时至关重要。有吞咽障碍的患者通常需要复杂且特定的干预措施,这需要改变日常行为模式。吞咽困难的患者若不遵循建议或规定的锻炼方法,可能无法从干预措施中获得最大益处。依从性差还会使在临床和实验环境中评估治疗效果变得更加困难。此外,如果不遵循某些建议,吞咽安全可能会受到影响。我们的目的是系统地回顾文献,以了解吞咽障碍治疗领域中关于依从性的已知情况。我们系统地确定了12项跟踪并报告患者特定依从性的研究。在本次综述中,我们发现这些研究的平均依从率在21.9%至51.9%之间。12项研究中有9项聚焦于头颈部癌症患者对预防性治疗建议的依从性。本次综述的结果表明,在吞咽障碍治疗的依从性方面存在很大的知识空白。很少有研究在其研究设计中考虑依从性。在规划吞咽障碍治疗研究时,研究人员必须纳入有关患者依从性的信息,以便准确解释研究结果。鉴于本次综述中发现的依从率存在差异,应确定影响患者对吞咽障碍治疗依从性的因素,以提高未来试验中的依从性。