• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺钼靶图像质量与乳房定位的关系:对当前使用的评估系统进行多中心国际评估,为建立标准化评估方法提供证据基础。

Mammographic image quality in relation to positioning of the breast: A multicentre international evaluation of the assessment systems currently used, to provide an evidence base for establishing a standardised method of assessment.

作者信息

Taylor K, Parashar D, Bouverat G, Poulos A, Gullien R, Stewart E, Aarre R, Crystal P, Wallis M

机构信息

Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, England, United Kingdom.

Cancer Research Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England, United Kingdom; Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Radiography (Lond). 2017 Nov;23(4):343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2017.03.004
PMID:28965899
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Optimum mammography positioning technique is necessary to maximise cancer detection. Current criteria for mammography appraisal lack reliability and validity with a need to develop a more objective system. We aimed to establish current international practice in assessing image quality (IQ), of screening mammograms then develop and validate a reproducible assessment tool.

METHODS

A questionnaire sent to centres in countries undertaking population screening identified practice, participants for an expert panel (EP) of radiologists/radiographers and a testing panel (TP) of radiographers. The EP developed category criteria and descriptors using a modified Delphi process to agree definitions. The EP scored 12 screening mammograms to test agreement then a main set of 178 cases. Weighted scores were derived for each descriptor enabling calculation of numerical parameters for each new category. The TP then scored the main set. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, t-tests and Kendall's coefficient.

RESULTS

11 centres in 8 countries responded forming an EP of 7 members and TP of 44 members. The EP showed moderate agreement when the scoring the mini test set W = 0.50 p < 0.001 and the main set W = 0.55 p < 0.001, 'posterior nipple line' being the most difficult descriptor. The weighted total scores differentiated the 4 new categories Perfect, Good, Adequate and Inadequate (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We have developed an assessment tool by Delphi consensus and weighted consensus criteria. We have successfully tabulated a range of numerical scores for each new category providing the first validated and reproducible mammography IQ scoring system.

摘要

引言

最佳的乳房X线摄影定位技术对于最大限度地检测癌症至关重要。当前乳房X线摄影评估标准缺乏可靠性和有效性,需要开发一个更客观的系统。我们旨在确立当前国际上评估筛查乳房X线摄影图像质量(IQ)的实践方法,然后开发并验证一种可重复的评估工具。

方法

向进行人群筛查的国家的中心发送问卷调查,以确定实践情况、放射科医生/放射技师专家小组(EP)和放射技师测试小组(TP)的参与者。EP使用改良的德尔菲法制定类别标准和描述符,以达成定义共识。EP对12张筛查乳房X线照片进行评分以测试一致性,然后对178例主要病例进行评分。为每个描述符得出加权分数,从而能够计算每个新类别的数值参数。然后TP对主要病例组进行评分。统计分析包括方差分析、t检验和肯德尔系数。

结果

8个国家的11个中心做出回应,组成了一个由7名成员组成的EP和一个由44名成员组成的TP。EP在对小型测试集评分时显示出中等一致性(W = 0.50,p < 0.001),对主要病例组评分时一致性为W = 0.55,p < 0.001,“乳头后线”是最难的描述符。加权总分区分了4个新类别:完美、良好、足够和不足(p < 0.001)。

结论

我们通过德尔菲共识和加权共识标准开发了一种评估工具。我们成功地为每个新类别列出了一系列数值分数,提供了首个经过验证且可重复的乳房X线摄影IQ评分系统。

相似文献

1
Mammographic image quality in relation to positioning of the breast: A multicentre international evaluation of the assessment systems currently used, to provide an evidence base for establishing a standardised method of assessment.乳腺钼靶图像质量与乳房定位的关系:对当前使用的评估系统进行多中心国际评估,为建立标准化评估方法提供证据基础。
Radiography (Lond). 2017 Nov;23(4):343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.荷兰乳腺癌筛查项目中,新培训的放射技师与经验丰富的放射技师的乳房X线摄影定位质量。
Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3322-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3738-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
3
Improving Performance of Mammographic Breast Positioning in an Academic Radiology Practice.提高学术放射实践中乳腺摄影体位的性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):807-815. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18212. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers.评估乳腺 X 光筛查中的乳房定位标准:人工智能软件与放射技师之间的一致性。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):448-455. doi: 10.1177/0969141321998718. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Clinical image quality in daily practice of breast cancer mammography screening.临床实践中乳腺癌筛查钼靶 X 线摄影的图像质量。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014 Aug;65(3):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.加拿大乳腺癌筛查项目日常实践中技术人员的特征与定位质量
Acad Radiol. 2016 Nov;23(11):1359-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Comparison of the validity and reliability of two image classification systems for the assessment of mammogram quality.两种用于评估乳房X线照片质量的图像分类系统的有效性和可靠性比较。
J Med Screen. 2005;12(1):38-42. doi: 10.1258/0969141053279149.
8
Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: An international comparison.乳腺筛查钼靶片阅读表现的审计反馈:一项国际比较。
J Med Screen. 2016 Sep;23(3):150-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141315610790. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review.放射技师在乳房X光检查解读中的表现:一项系统综述。
Breast. 2008 Feb;17(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.035. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
10
Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.波兰乳腺钼靶筛查机构物理参数质量控制结果与乳腺钼靶图像临床评估结果的比较。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Sep;147(1-2):206-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr321. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying key factors in the mammography procedure for delineating the pectoral muscle using the analytic hierarchy process.运用层次分析法确定乳腺钼靶检查中描绘胸肌的关键因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):7966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92350-9.
2
Impact of Artificial Intelligence-driven Quality Improvement Software on Mammography Technical Repeat and Recall Rates.人工智能驱动的质量改进软件对乳腺钼靶摄影技术重复率和召回率的影响。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2023 Oct 25;5(6):e230038. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230038. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images.
两种用于乳腺 X 光图像中胸肌去除的包的比较。
Radiol Med. 2022 Aug;127(8):848-856. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01521-5. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Full-field digital mammography: the '30% rule' and influences on visualisation of the pectoralis major muscle on the craniocaudal view of the breast.全数字化乳腺摄影:“30% 法则”以及其对乳腺头尾位胸大肌显示的影响。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Sep;67(3):177-184. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.404. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists.采用德尔菲法,与放射技师和放射科医生就乳腺植入物乳房X线摄影的图像质量评估标准达成共识。
Insights Imaging. 2020 Apr 3;11(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00860-z.
6
Current practice in mammographic imaging of the augmented breast in Australia.澳大利亚增强型乳房的乳腺 X 线摄影成像的当前实践。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Jun;67(2):102-110. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.374. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection.乳腺头尾位投照的乳房X线摄影定位图像质量标准综述。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1082):20170611. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170611. Epub 2017 Dec 5.