Eriksen Marcus, Liboiron Max, Kiessling Tim, Charron Louis, Alling Abigail, Lebreton Laurent, Richards Heather, Roth Barent, Ory Nicolas C, Hidalgo-Ruz Valeria, Meerhoff Erika, Box Carolynn, Cummins Anna, Thiel Martin
5 Gyres Institute, 3131 Olympic Blvd #302, Santa Monica, CA, 90404, USA.
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Geography Department, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Environ Pollut. 2018 Jan;232:430-439. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.058. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Many typical neuston trawls can only be used during relatively calm sea states and slow tow speeds. During two expeditions to the Bay of Bengal and the eastern South Pacific we investigated whether the new, high-speed AVANI trawl (All-purpose Velocity Accelerated Net Instrument) collects similar amounts and types of microplastics as two established scientific trawl designs, the manta trawl and the DiSalvo neuston net. Using a 335 μm net, the AVANI trawl can collect microplastics from the sea surface at speeds up to 8 knots as it "skis" across the surface, whereas the manta and DiSalvo neuston trawls must be towed slowly in a less turbulent sea state and often represent shorter tow lengths. Generally, the AVANI trawl collected a greater numerical abundance and weight of plastic particles in most size classes and debris types than the manta trawl and DiSalvo neuston net, likely because these trawls only skim the surface layer while the AVANI trawl, moving vertically in a random fashion, collects a "deeper" sample, capturing the few plastics that float slightly lower in the water column. However, the samples did not differ enough that results were significantly affected, suggesting that studies done with these different trawls are comparable. The advantage of the AVANI trawl over traditional research trawls is that it allows for collection on vessels underway at high speeds and during long transits, allowing for a nearly continuous sampling effort over long distances. As local surface currents make sea surface abundance widely heterogeneous, widely spaced short-tow trawls, such as the manta and DiSalvo trawls, can catch or miss hotspots or meso-scale variability of microplastic accumulations, whereas the AVANI trawl, if utilized for back-to-back tows of intermediate distances (5-10 km), can bridge variable wind conditions and debris concentrations potentially reducing variance and provide a greater resolution of spatial distribution.
许多典型的漂浮生物拖网只能在相对平静的海况和较慢的拖曳速度下使用。在两次前往孟加拉湾和南太平洋东部的考察中,我们研究了新型高速AVANI拖网(通用速度加速网具)收集的微塑料数量和类型是否与两种既定的科学拖网设计——蝠鲼拖网和迪萨尔沃漂浮生物网——相似。使用335微米的网,AVANI拖网在以高达8节的速度“滑过”海面时,可以从海面收集微塑料,而蝠鲼和迪萨尔沃漂浮生物拖网必须在海况较平静时缓慢拖曳,而且拖曳长度通常较短。一般来说,在大多数尺寸类别和碎片类型中,AVANI拖网收集到的塑料颗粒数量和重量比蝠鲼拖网和迪萨尔沃漂浮生物网更多,这可能是因为这些拖网只掠过表层,而AVANI拖网以随机方式垂直移动,收集到一个“更深”的样本,捕获了在水柱中稍微低浮的少量塑料。然而,样本之间的差异不足以显著影响结果,这表明使用这些不同拖网进行的研究具有可比性。AVANI拖网相对于传统研究拖网的优势在于,它允许在高速航行的船只上以及长时间航行期间进行收集,从而能够在长距离上进行几乎连续的采样工作。由于局部表层洋流使海面丰度差异很大,像蝠鲼和迪萨尔沃拖网这样间隔较大的短拖曳拖网可能会捕捉到或错过微塑料积累的热点或中尺度变化,而如果将AVANI拖网用于中等距离(5 - 10公里)的连续拖曳,它可以跨越不同的风况和碎片浓度,潜在地减少方差并提供更高的空间分布分辨率。