• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面对面的酒精咨询与计算机生成的反馈:一项随机对照试验的结果。

In-person alcohol counseling versus computer-generated feedback: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald.

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2018 Jan;37(1):70-80. doi: 10.1037/hea0000556. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1037/hea0000556
PMID:28967769
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the comparative 2-year efficacy of brief alcohol interventions delivered in-person versus through computer-generated feedback letters among general hospital inpatients with at-risk alcohol use.

METHODS

In 2011-2012, all general hospital inpatients aged 18-64 years on 13 wards at 4 medical departments in 1 general hospital were systematically screened for at-risk alcohol use. Nine-hundred sixty-one inpatients who screened positive for at-risk alcohol use and negative for more severe alcohol problems were randomized by timeframe to in-person counseling (PE), computer-generated feedback letters (CO) and assessment only (AO). Both interventions included 3 contacts: on the ward and 1 and 3 months later and were based on the transtheoretical model (TTM). After 6, 12, 18, and 24 months computer-assisted telephone interviews assessed self-report outcomes: gram alcohol per week (primary), at-risk alcohol use and highest blood alcohol concentration (both secondary). Latent growth models were used.

RESULTS

After 24 months, CO resulted in a greater reduction of self-reported gram alcohol per week than AO (p = .027); PE did not differ significantly from AO (p = .503) and CO (p = .088); and group differences concerning secondary outcomes were not statistically significant (ps > 0.07). After 6 months, the odds of at-risk alcohol use were reduced by half in PE versus AO (odds ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant group differences between in-person counseling and computer-generated feedback letters were found. TTM-based computer-generated feedback letters reduced self-reported gram alcohol over 2 years and can be considered a long-term effective alternative in medical settings when addressing at-risk alcohol use. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

在有风险的酒精使用的一般住院患者中,比较面对面和通过计算机生成的反馈信件进行简短酒精干预的 2 年效果。

方法

在 2011-2012 年,在 4 个医疗部门的 13 个病房中,对所有 18-64 岁的一般住院患者进行系统筛查,以确定是否有风险的酒精使用。对筛查出有风险的酒精使用且无更严重酒精问题的 961 名住院患者,按时间框架随机分配到面对面咨询(PE)、计算机生成的反馈信件(CO)和仅评估(AO)组。两种干预措施都包括 3 次接触:在病房内以及 1 个月和 3 个月后,干预措施基于跨理论模型(TTM)。在 6、12、18 和 24 个月时,通过计算机辅助电话访谈评估自我报告的结果:每周饮酒量(主要结果)、有风险的酒精使用和最高血液酒精浓度(次要结果)。使用潜在增长模型。

结果

在 24 个月时,CO 导致自我报告的每周饮酒量减少多于 AO(p =.027);PE 与 AO(p =.503)和 CO(p =.088)之间的差异不显著;次要结果的组间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.07)。在 6 个月时,与 AO 相比,PE 使有风险的酒精使用的几率减半(优势比=0.50,95%置信区间:0.25-0.98)。

结论

面对面咨询与计算机生成的反馈信件之间没有发现显著的组间差异。基于 TTM 的计算机生成的反馈信件在 2 年内减少了自我报告的饮酒量,并且可以在医疗环境中作为处理有风险的酒精使用的长期有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
In-person alcohol counseling versus computer-generated feedback: Results from a randomized controlled trial.面对面的酒精咨询与计算机生成的反馈:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Health Psychol. 2018 Jan;37(1):70-80. doi: 10.1037/hea0000556. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
How alcohol use problem severity affects the outcome of brief intervention delivered in-person versus through computer-generated feedback letters.酒精使用问题严重程度如何影响面对面的简短干预和通过计算机生成的反馈信两种方式的干预效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Feb 1;183:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
Can brief alcohol interventions in general hospital inpatients improve mental and general health over 2 years? Results from a randomized controlled trial.在综合医院住院患者中进行简短的酒精干预是否可以在 2 年内改善心理和一般健康状况?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jul;49(10):1722-1730. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002453. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Social Equity in the Efficacy of Computer-Based and In-Person Brief Alcohol Interventions Among General Hospital Patients With At-Risk Alcohol Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial.综合医院有酒精使用风险患者中基于计算机和面对面简短酒精干预效果的社会公平性:一项随机对照试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Jan 28;9(1):e31712. doi: 10.2196/31712.
5
Sick days in general hospital patients two years after brief alcohol intervention: Secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.一般住院患者在接受简短酒精干预治疗两年后的病假情况:一项随机对照试验的次要结局。
Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106106. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106106. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
6
In-person and computer-based alcohol interventions at general hospitals: reach and retention.综合医院中面对面及基于计算机的酒精干预措施:覆盖面与留存率
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Oct;26(5):844-849. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv238. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
7
Does impaired mental health interfere with the outcome of brief alcohol intervention at general hospitals?心理健康受损是否会干扰综合医院简短酒精干预的效果?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jun;85(6):562-573. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000201. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
The Role of Tobacco Smoking in the Efficacy of Brief Alcohol Intervention: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.烟草使用对简短酒精干预疗效的作用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 11;19(10):5847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105847.
9
Who benefits from computer-based brief alcohol intervention? Day-to-day drinking patterns as a moderator of intervention efficacy.谁能从基于计算机的简短酒精干预中受益?日常饮酒模式作为干预效果的调节因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jun 1;175:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.040. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
The Role of Sex and Age in Moderating the Outcome of In-Person and Computer-Based Brief Alcohol Interventions at General Hospitals: Reanalysis of a Brief Intervention Study.性别与年龄在调节综合医院面对面及基于计算机的简短酒精干预结果中的作用:一项简短干预研究的重新分析
Eur Addict Res. 2022;28(6):455-461. doi: 10.1159/000526339. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of screening and ultra-brief intervention for hazardous drinking in primary care: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中针对危险饮酒的筛查及超简短干预的有效性:实用整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2025 Aug 12;390:e083985. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083985.
2
Application of the ant colony optimization algorithm for the construction of a short version of the German alcohol decisional balance scale.蚁群优化算法在构建德国酒精决策平衡量表简版中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 25;15(1):27122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12087-3.
3
The effectiveness of an ultra-brief intervention in 1 min for hazardous drinking in a general hospital setting: A quasi-randomized pilot trial.
在综合医院环境中针对危险饮酒进行的1分钟超简短干预的效果:一项半随机试点试验。
PCN Rep. 2024 Jun 18;3(2):e216. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.216. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Do in-person and computer-based brief alcohol interventions reduce tobacco smoking among general hospital patients? Secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.面对面和基于计算机的简短酒精干预是否能减少综合医院患者的吸烟行为?一项随机对照试验的次要结局。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 13;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00425-7.
5
Seeking care where they can: A systematic review of global trends in online alcohol treatment utilization among non-veteran and veteran women.在力所能及之处寻求治疗:对非退伍军人和退伍军人女性在线酒精治疗利用情况全球趋势的系统评价
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Nov 17;5:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100116. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Three-year trajectories of alcohol use among at-risk and among low-risk drinkers in a general population sample of adults: A latent class growth analysis of a brief intervention trial.在一项成人一般人群样本中,高危饮酒者和低危饮酒者的饮酒行为三年轨迹:一项简短干预试验的潜在类别增长分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1027837. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1027837. eCollection 2022.
7
Sensitivity analyses for data missing at random versus missing not at random using latent growth modelling: a practical guide for randomised controlled trials.使用潜在增长模型对随机缺失与非随机缺失数据进行敏感性分析:随机对照试验的实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 24;22(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01727-1.
8
Proactive automatised lifestyle intervention (PAL) in general hospital patients: study protocol of a single-group trial.主动式自动化生活方式干预(PAL)在综合医院患者中的应用:一项单组试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e065136. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065136.
9
The Role of Tobacco Smoking in the Efficacy of Brief Alcohol Intervention: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.烟草使用对简短酒精干预疗效的作用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 11;19(10):5847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105847.
10
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Alcohol Moderation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症幸存者数字饮酒干预措施的有效性、成本效益和成本效用:一项实用随机对照试验的健康经济评价和结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e30095. doi: 10.2196/30095.