Suppr超能文献

迈向宏基因组研究中人粪便样本处理的标准。

Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies.

机构信息

Structural and Computational Biology, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1069-1076. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3960. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Abstract

Technical variation in metagenomic analysis must be minimized to confidently assess the contributions of microbiota to human health. Here we tested 21 representative DNA extraction protocols on the same fecal samples and quantified differences in observed microbial community composition. We compared them with differences due to library preparation and sample storage, which we contrasted with observed biological variation within the same specimen or within an individual over time. We found that DNA extraction had the largest effect on the outcome of metagenomic analysis. To rank DNA extraction protocols, we considered resulting DNA quantity and quality, and we ascertained biases in estimates of community diversity and the ratio between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. We recommend a standardized DNA extraction method for human fecal samples, for which transferability across labs was established and which was further benchmarked using a mock community of known composition. Its adoption will improve comparability of human gut microbiome studies and facilitate meta-analyses.

摘要

为了有把握地评估微生物组对人类健康的贡献,必须最大限度地减少宏基因组分析中的技术差异。在这里,我们在相同的粪便样本上测试了 21 种有代表性的 DNA 提取方案,并量化了观察到的微生物群落组成的差异。我们将这些差异与文库制备和样本储存引起的差异进行了比较,同时还比较了同一标本内或同一个体随时间的变化所观察到的生物变异。我们发现,DNA 提取对宏基因组分析的结果影响最大。为了对 DNA 提取方案进行排名,我们考虑了提取得到的 DNA 的数量和质量,并确定了对群落多样性估计和革兰氏阳性菌与革兰氏阴性菌比例的偏差。我们建议使用一种标准化的人类粪便样本的 DNA 提取方法,该方法已在不同实验室之间具有可转移性,并使用已知组成的模拟群落进行了进一步的基准测试。该方法的采用将提高人类肠道微生物组研究的可比性,并促进荟萃分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验