Suppr超能文献

视网膜电图免疫组化在评估睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤淋巴管侵犯中的应用:一项回顾性初步研究

Utility of ERG Immunohistochemistry for Evaluation of Lymphovascular Invasion in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Retrospective Pilot Study.

作者信息

Udager Aaron M, McHugh Jonathan B, Morgan Todd M, Spratt Daniel E, Chinnaiyan Arul M, Mehra Rohit

机构信息

Departments of *Pathology †Urology §Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School ‡Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School ∥Michigan Center for Translational Pathology ¶Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 May/Jun;27(5):392-401. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000597.

Abstract

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) is an important stage-determining variable in the evaluation of radical orchiectomy specimens. ERG endothelial cell expression, as detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), robustly highlights lymphovascular spaces, and thus, we sought to assess the utility of ERG IHC for evaluation of GCT LVI. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides from a retrospective cohort of 25 GCT radical orchiectomy specimens (emanating from a parent cohort of 159 radical orchiectomy GCT cases identified between 2003 and 2013) were reviewed, and sections with foci of positive or equivocal LVI were identified. ERG IHC was performed on sections off the surface of corresponding paraffin tissue blocks. All foci were then rescored as positive, equivocal, or negative for LVI based on ERG endothelial cell expression. Twenty-three and 13 foci were positive or equivocal for LVI by H&E staining, respectively. Among the H&E positive LVI foci, 20 (87%) were ERG IHC positive, whereas of the H&E equivocal LVI foci, 5 (38%) were ERG IHC positive, 3 (23%) were ERG IHC negative, and 2 (15%) were ERG IHC equivocal; all other foci were lost for evaluation. Overall, ERG IHC helped resolve the LVI status of 61% of foci deemed equivocal for LVI by H&E staining only. Although ERG IHC is useful in confirming definitive LVI status in a subset of GCT cases, the overall clinical impact of ERG IHC is limited for H&E equivocal LVI foci in this specific retrospective patient cohort. Overall, in carefully selected clinical scenarios, these data suggest a supportive role for ERG IHC in evaluation of GCT LVI in radical orchiectomy specimens.

摘要

睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤(GCT)的淋巴管浸润(LVI)是评估根治性睾丸切除术标本时一个重要的分期决定变量。通过免疫组织化学(IHC)检测的ERG内皮细胞表达能清晰显示淋巴管间隙,因此,我们试图评估ERG IHC在评估GCT LVI中的效用。回顾了25例GCT根治性睾丸切除术标本(来自2003年至2013年间确定的159例根治性睾丸切除术GCT病例的母队列)的苏木精和伊红(H&E)切片,并识别出LVI阳性或可疑的区域。对相应石蜡组织块表面的切片进行ERG IHC检测。然后根据ERG内皮细胞表达将所有区域重新分类为LVI阳性、可疑或阴性。H&E染色显示分别有23个和13个区域LVI阳性或可疑。在H&E阳性的LVI区域中,20个(87%)ERG IHC阳性,而在H&E可疑的LVI区域中,5个(38%)ERG IHC阳性,3个(23%)ERG IHC阴性,2个(15%)ERG IHC可疑;所有其他区域均无法进行评估。总体而言,ERG IHC有助于确定仅通过H&E染色判定为LVI可疑的区域中61%的LVI状态。虽然ERG IHC在确认一部分GCT病例的明确LVI状态方面有用,但在这个特定的回顾性患者队列中,ERG IHC对H&E可疑的LVI区域的总体临床影响有限。总体而言,在精心挑选的临床场景中,这些数据表明ERG IHC在评估根治性睾丸切除术标本中的GCT LVI方面具有辅助作用。

相似文献

1
Utility of ERG Immunohistochemistry for Evaluation of Lymphovascular Invasion in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Retrospective Pilot Study.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 May/Jun;27(5):392-401. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000597.
2
ERG Immunohistochemistry as an Endothelial Marker for Assessing Lymphovascular Invasion.
Korean J Pathol. 2013 Aug;47(4):355-64. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.4.355. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
5
Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver variability study.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Dec;32(12):1816-21. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181816083.
7
Morphologic Pattern, Frequency, and Spatial Distribution of Lymphovascular Invasion Foci in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.
Int J Surg Pathol. 2023 Sep;31(6):939-948. doi: 10.1177/10668969221110456. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
9
Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion Detected by D2-40 in Low-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 23;13(11):e19825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19825. eCollection 2021 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomarkers of disease recurrence in stage I testicular germ cell tumours.
Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Nov;19(11):637-658. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00624-y. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
ERG Immunohistochemistry as an Endothelial Marker for Assessing Lymphovascular Invasion.
Korean J Pathol. 2013 Aug;47(4):355-64. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.4.355. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
2
Assessment of vascular invasion in gastric cancer: a comparative study.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 28;19(24):3761-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3761.
3
Histologic criteria and pitfalls in the diagnosis of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Dec;36(12):1865-73. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318262c3d0.
4
Lymphovascular invasion in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: a study of 22 cases.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Jun;136(6):635-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0463-OA.
5
Difficult differential diagnoses in testicular pathology.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Apr;136(4):435-46. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0475-RA.
7
9
Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver variability study.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Dec;32(12):1816-21. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181816083.
10
Trials of new germ cell immunohistochemical stains in 93 extragonadal and metastatic germ cell tumors.
Hum Pathol. 2008 Feb;39(2):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Nov 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验