Rusaw David F, Rudholmer Elin, Barnett Cleveland T
School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
The aims of this study were to empirically quantify reliability and learning effects of a Limits of Stability protocol for transtibial prosthesis users. Outcome variables from center of pressure and center of mass were tested on: 1) multiple test repetitions within a single test occasion; and 2) between multiple test occasions. Trantibial prosthesis users (n=7) and matched controls (n=7) executed five trials of the Limits of Stability protocol on two occasions per day, on two consecutive days. Inter-trial learning effects and reliability of outcomes extracted via center of mass and center of pressure were evaluated utilizing standard biomechanics laboratory equipment. Reliability was good to excellent except the reaction time variable which was poor (Pooled 95%CI of ICC=0.248-0.484). An inter-trial learning effect was present in directional control for prosthesis users when the first trial was included in analysis (center of mass: 95%CI of r=0.065-0.239; center of pressure: 95%CI of r=0.076-0.249). The use of standard biomechanics lab equipment can produce reliable results for the Limits of Stability protocol. Researchers should be aware of low reliability of reaction time variable in the protocol assessed and should execute at least one practice trial prior to that which is used in subsequent analysis.
本研究的目的是通过实证量化经胫假肢使用者稳定性极限协议的可靠性和学习效果。对来自压力中心和质心的结果变量进行了测试:1)在单个测试场合内的多次测试重复;2)在多个测试场合之间。经胫假肢使用者(n = 7)和匹配的对照组(n = 7)连续两天每天进行两次稳定性极限协议的五次试验。利用标准生物力学实验室设备评估通过质心和压力中心提取的结果的试验间学习效果和可靠性。除反应时间变量较差外(ICC的合并95%CI = 0.248 - 0.484),可靠性良好至优秀。当第一次试验纳入分析时,假肢使用者在方向控制方面存在试验间学习效果(质心:r的95%CI = 0.065 - 0.239;压力中心:r的95%CI = 0.076 - 0.249)。使用标准生物力学实验室设备可为稳定性极限协议产生可靠的结果。研究人员应注意评估协议中反应时间变量的低可靠性,并应在后续分析所使用的试验之前至少进行一次练习试验。