• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SOFA、APACHE IV和SAPS II评分系统在预测急性心肌炎患者短期死亡率中的价值。

Value of SOFA, APACHE IV and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting short-term mortality in patients with acute myocarditis.

作者信息

Sun Dating, Ding Hu, Zhao Chunxia, Li Yuanyuan, Wang Jing, Yan Jiangtao, Wang Dao Wen

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(38):63073-63083. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18634. eCollection 2017 Sep 8.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.18634
PMID:28968972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5609904/
Abstract

Acute myocarditis is an uncommon and potentially life-threatening disease. Scoring systems are essential for predicting outcome and evaluating the therapy effect of adult patients with acute myocarditis. The aim of this study was to determine the value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV) and second Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) scoring systems in predicting short-term mortality of these patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from 305 adult patients suffering from acute myocarditis between April 2005 and August 2016. The association between the value of admission SOFA, APACHE IV and SAPS II scores and risk of short-term mortality was determined. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that SOFA, APACHE IV and SAPS II scores were independent risk factors of death in patients with acute myocarditis. For each scoring system, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative short-term mortality was significantly higher in patients with higher admission scores compared with those with lower admission scores. For the prediction of short-term mortality in a patient with acute myocarditis, SAPS II had the highest accuracy followed by the APACHE IV and SOFA scores.

摘要

急性心肌炎是一种罕见且可能危及生命的疾病。评分系统对于预测成年急性心肌炎患者的预后及评估治疗效果至关重要。本研究旨在确定序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估IV(APACHE IV)和简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)评分系统在预测这些患者短期死亡率方面的价值。我们回顾性分析了2005年4月至2016年8月期间305例成年急性心肌炎患者的数据。确定了入院时SOFA、APACHE IV和SAPS II评分值与短期死亡风险之间的关联。多因素Cox分析表明,SOFA、APACHE IV和SAPS II评分是急性心肌炎患者死亡的独立危险因素。对于每个评分系统,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,入院评分较高的患者累积短期死亡率显著高于入院评分较低的患者。对于预测急性心肌炎患者的短期死亡率,SAPS II的准确性最高,其次是APACHE IV和SOFA评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d7b/5609904/1cfd037cb6eb/oncotarget-08-63073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d7b/5609904/6e98e932ce10/oncotarget-08-63073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d7b/5609904/1cfd037cb6eb/oncotarget-08-63073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d7b/5609904/6e98e932ce10/oncotarget-08-63073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d7b/5609904/1cfd037cb6eb/oncotarget-08-63073-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Value of SOFA, APACHE IV and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting short-term mortality in patients with acute myocarditis.SOFA、APACHE IV和SAPS II评分系统在预测急性心肌炎患者短期死亡率中的价值。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(38):63073-63083. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18634. eCollection 2017 Sep 8.
2
Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及简化急性生理学评分系统II在重症监护病房百草枯中毒患者中的预后评分系统的有效性。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 May;36(5):431-437. doi: 10.1177/0960327116657602. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
3
Predictive value of the APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA and GCS scoring systems in patients with severe purulent bacterial meningitis.APACHE II、SAPS II、SOFA和GCS评分系统在重症化脓性细菌性脑膜炎患者中的预测价值。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(3):175-9. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0030. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
[Predictive values of different critical scoring systems for survival rate after discharge in critically ill patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation].[不同危急评分系统对体外膜肺氧合支持的危重症患者出院后生存率的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 May;30(5):456-460. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.05.012.
5
Performance assessment of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting the outcomes of adult patients with hepatic portal venous gas in the ED.简化急性生理学评分II、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II评分以及序贯器官衰竭评估评分在预测急诊科成年肝门静脉积气患者预后中的性能评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;32(12):1481-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
6
The outcome of critical illness in decompensated alcoholic liver cirrhosis.失代偿期酒精性肝硬化患者的危重病结局。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Sep;56(8):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02692.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI: APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute-Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者结局评分的预测价值:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)、埃勒布特-斯通纳评分(Elebute-Stoner)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)及简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013 Nov;108(8):666-74. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0234-2. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
8
Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India.四种重症患者严重程度评估评分系统对患者预后预测的比较:来自印度中部一家三级中心的前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 6;16(8):e66268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66268. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Performance on the APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA and the OHCA score of post-cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia.接受治疗性低温治疗的心脏骤停后患者的 APACHE II、SAPS II、SOFA 和 OHCA 评分的表现。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196197. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients.比较序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 和创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法在预测 ICU 创伤患者结局中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical support for the treatment of fulminant myocarditis combined with cardiac arrest and MODS in children: A case report and review.儿童暴发性心肌炎合并心脏骤停及多器官功能障碍综合征的机械支持治疗:一例报告及文献复习
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(17):e36723. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36723. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
Comparing Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Poisoning Severity Score for Outcome Prediction of Pesticide Poisoned Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.比较序贯器官衰竭评估评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II、改良急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II、简化急性生理学评分II及中毒严重程度评分对入住重症监护病房的农药中毒患者预后的预测价值。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2024 Jan 31;12(2):49-57. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_43_23. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the APACHE IV model and its comparison with the APACHE II, SAPS 3, and Korean SAPS 3 models for the prediction of hospital mortality in a Korean surgical intensive care unit.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统IV(APACHE IV)模型的验证及其与急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)和韩国简化急性生理学评分系统3(Korean SAPS 3)模型在韩国外科重症监护病房预测医院死亡率方面的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Aug;67(2):115-22. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.2.115. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
2
Prevalence of acute kidney injury and prognostic significance in patients with acute myocarditis.急性心肌炎患者急性肾损伤的患病率及预后意义
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048055. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
3
Mortality predictive value of APACHE II Scores in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study.重症监护病房中COVID-19患者的APACHE II评分的死亡率预测价值:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 18;85(6):2464-2468. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000641. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Incidence, Associated Factors, and Outcome of Delirium among Patients Admitted to ICUs in Oman.阿曼重症监护病房收治患者谵妄的发病率、相关因素及转归
Crit Care Res Pract. 2022 Oct 4;2022:4692483. doi: 10.1155/2022/4692483. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of mortality prediction using SOFA and APACHE IV tools in trauma and non-trauma patients admitted to the ICU.评估创伤和非创伤 ICU 患者使用 SOFA 和 APACHE IV 工具预测死亡率。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Sep 30;27(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00822-9.
6
Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches.哪种模型在预测 ICU 生存率方面更具优势:人工智能与传统方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 26;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01903-9.
7
Development and validation of a risk stratification model for predicting the mortality of acute kidney injury in critical care patients.预测重症监护患者急性肾损伤死亡率的风险分层模型的开发与验证
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(4):323. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5723.
8
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: Contemporary insights on the clinicopathological spectrum.多器官功能障碍综合征:关于临床病理谱的当代见解
Qatar Med J. 2020 Sep 22;2020(1):22. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.22. eCollection 2020.
9
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score as a Predictor of Hospital Mortality in Patients of Coronavirus Disease 2019.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估系统 II 评分对新型冠状病毒肺炎患者住院病死率的预测价值。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):e657-e665. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004411.
10
The predictive power of SAPS-3 and SOFA scores and their relations with patient outcomes in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.外科重症监护病房中SAPS-3和SOFA评分的预测能力及其与患者预后的关系。
Turk J Surg. 2019 Jun 13;35(2):124-130. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4223. eCollection 2019 Jun.
CMR in myocarditis: valuable tool, room for improvement.
心脏磁共振成像在心肌炎中的应用:有价值的工具,仍有改进空间。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May;5(5):525-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.014.
4
Comparison between Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA) and Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) for mortality prediction after cardiac surgery.序贯器官衰竭评估评分(SOFA)与心脏手术评分(CASUS)在预测心脏手术后死亡率方面的比较。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;60(1):35-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270943. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
5
Prognostic electrocardiographic parameters in patients with suspected myocarditis.疑似心肌炎患者的预后心电图参数。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Apr;13(4):398-405. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq229. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
6
A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.一种估算肾小球滤过率的新公式。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.
7
Myocarditis.心肌炎
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1526-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0800028.
8
Predictors of outcome in patients with suspected myocarditis.疑似心肌炎患者预后的预测因素。
Circulation. 2008 Aug 5;118(6):639-48. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.769489. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
9
A prospective study of biopsy-proven myocarditis: prognostic relevance of clinical and aetiopathogenetic features at diagnosis.一项经活检证实的心肌炎前瞻性研究:诊断时临床及病因发病机制特征的预后相关性。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun;28(11):1326-33. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm076. Epub 2007 May 9.
10
Discovery and inclusion of SOFA score episodes in mortality prediction.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分事件在死亡率预测中的发现与纳入
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6):649-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 Mar 31.