Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Sep 1;119(3):492-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex219.
Brain injury in newborn animals from prolonged anaesthetic exposure has raised concerns for millions of children undergoing anaesthesia every yr. Alternative anaesthetic techniques or mitigating strategies are urgently needed to ameliorate potentially harmful effects. We tested dexmedetomidine, both as a single agent alternative technique and as a mitigating adjuvant for sevoflurane anaesthesia.
Neonatal rats were randomized to three injections of dexmedetomidine (5, 25, 50, or 100 µg kg -1 every 2 h), or 6 h of 2.5% sevoflurane as a single agent without or with dexmedetomidine (1, 5, 10, or 20 µg kg -1 every 2 h). Heart rate, oxygen saturation, level of consciousness, and response to pain were assessed. Cell death was quantified in several brain regions.
Dexmedetomidine provided lower levels of sedation and pain control than sevoflurane. Exposure to either sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine alone did not cause mortality, but the combination of 2.5% sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine in doses exceeding 1 µg kg -1 did. Sevoflurane increased apoptosis in all brain regions; supplementation with dexmedetomidine exacerbated neuronal injury, potentially as a result of ventilatory or haemodynamic compromise. Dexmedetomidine by itself increased apoptosis only in CA2/3 and the ventral posterior nucleus, but not in prefrontal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, somatosensory cortex, subiculum, lateral dorsal thalamic nucleaus, or hippocampal CA1.
We confirm previous findings of sevoflurane-induced neuronal injury. Dexmedetomidine, even in the highest dose, did not cause similar injury, but provided lesser degrees of anaesthesia and pain control. No mitigation of sevoflurane-induced injury was observed with dexmedetomidine supplementation, suggesting that future studies should focus on anaesthetic-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine, rather than injury-preventing effects.
长时间麻醉暴露导致新生动物脑损伤,这使每年数百万例行麻醉的儿童的家长感到担忧。目前急需替代麻醉技术或缓解策略来减轻潜在的有害影响。我们测试了右美托咪定,将其作为单一替代技术和七氟醚麻醉的缓解辅助剂进行测试。
新生大鼠随机分为三组,分别接受右美托咪定(5、25、50 或 100μg/kg,每 2 小时 1 次)3 次注射,或 6 小时 2.5%七氟醚麻醉,不使用或使用右美托咪定(1、5、10 或 20μg/kg,每 2 小时 1 次)。评估心率、氧饱和度、意识水平和疼痛反应。在多个脑区量化细胞死亡。
右美托咪定提供的镇静和疼痛控制水平低于七氟醚。单独暴露于七氟醚或右美托咪定均不会导致死亡,但 2.5%七氟醚和剂量超过 1μg/kg 的右美托咪定联合使用会导致死亡。七氟醚增加了所有脑区的细胞凋亡;右美托咪定的补充加剧了神经元损伤,可能是由于通气或血液动力学受损所致。右美托咪定本身仅在 CA2/3 和腹后核中增加细胞凋亡,但在前额叶皮质、后扣带回皮质、体感皮质、下托、外侧背丘脑核或海马 CA1 中则没有。
我们证实了先前关于七氟醚诱导的神经元损伤的发现。即使使用最高剂量的右美托咪定,也不会引起类似的损伤,但提供了较低程度的麻醉和疼痛控制。右美托咪定补充并没有减轻七氟醚诱导的损伤,这表明未来的研究应集中在右美托咪定的麻醉节省作用上,而不是预防损伤的作用上。