Hinney Barbara, Gottwald Michaela, Moser Jasmine, Reicher Bianca, Schäfer Bhavapriya Jasmin, Schaper Roland, Joachim Anja, Künzel Frank
Institute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Department/Clinic for Companion Animals and Horses, Clinical Unit of Internal Medicine Small Animals, Veterinary University of Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Vet Parasitol. 2017 Oct 15;245:106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
Several endoparasites of dogs cannot only be detrimental to their primary host but might also represent a threat to human health because of their zoonotic potential. Due to their high dog population densities, metropolitan areas can be highly endemic for such parasites. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of endoparasites in dogs in the Austrian capital of Vienna by examining a representative number of canine faecal samples and to compare the prevalences with two neighbouring peri-urban and rural regions. In addition we analysed whether the density of dog populations and cleanliness of dog zones correlated with parasite occurrence. We collected 1001 anonymous faecal samples from 55 dog zones from all 23 districts of the federal state of Vienna, as well as 480 faecal samples from the Mödling district and Wolkersdorf with a peri-urban and rural character, respectively. Faeces were examined by flotation and by Baermann technique. Additionally we evaluated 292 Viennese, 102 peri-urban and 50 rural samples for Giardia and Cryptosporidium by GiardiaFASTest and CryptoFASTest. Samples from "clean" dog zones were compared to samples from "dirty" zones. The infection rate of Toxocara was surprisingly low, ranging from 0.6% to 1.9%. Trichuris was the most frequent helminth (1.8-7.5%) and Giardia the most frequent protozoan (4.0-10.8%). Ancylostomatidae, Crenosoma, Capillaria, Taeniidae, Cystoisospora and Sarcocystis were found in 1.8-2.2%, 0-0.9%, 0-0.9%, 0-0.6%, 0.3-3.1% and 0-0.6% of the samples, respectively. Samples from "dirty" dog zones in Vienna showed a significantly higher rate of parasites overall (p=0.003) and of Trichuris (p=0.048) compared to samples from "clean" dog zones. There were no statistically significant differences in densely vs. less densely populated areas of Vienna. Samples from the rural region of Wolkersdorf had significantly higher overall parasite, Trichuris and Cystoisospora prevalences than the peri-urban Mödling district and Vienna (p=0.000-0.039), while samples from the Mödling district had a significantly higher Giardia, Crenosoma and Capillaria prevalence than those from Vienna (p=0.002-0.047). Parasite excretion is dynamic and representative sampling and monitoring are necessary for parasite surveillance. Dog owners should be informed about the zoonotic risk and encouraged to remove dog faeces and dispose of them properly to reduce the infection risk for both other dogs and humans.
犬类的几种体内寄生虫不仅会对其主要宿主造成损害,还可能因其人畜共患病的潜在风险对人类健康构成威胁。由于大都市区犬类种群密度高,这些寄生虫在该地区可能具有高度地方性流行特征。我们旨在通过检测具有代表性数量的犬类粪便样本,估算奥地利首都维也纳犬类体内寄生虫的感染率,并将其与两个相邻的城郊和农村地区的感染率进行比较。此外,我们分析了犬类种群密度和犬类活动区域的清洁程度与寄生虫感染情况之间是否存在关联。我们从维也纳联邦州所有23个区的55个犬类活动区域收集了1001份匿名粪便样本,以及分别具有城郊和农村特征的默德林区和沃尔克斯多夫的480份粪便样本。粪便样本通过浮选法和贝尔曼技术进行检测。此外,我们还使用GiardiaFASTest和CryptoFASTest对292份维也纳样本、102份城郊样本和50份农村样本进行了贾第虫和隐孢子虫检测。将“清洁”犬类活动区域的样本与“肮脏”区域的样本进行比较。弓首蛔虫的感染率出奇地低,在0.6%至1.9%之间。鞭虫是最常见的蠕虫(1.8 - 7.5%),贾第虫是最常见的原生动物(4.0 - 10.8%)。钩口线虫科、犬肺线虫、毛细线虫、带科绦虫、等孢球虫属和肉孢子虫属在样本中的检出率分别为1.8 - 2.2%、0 - 0.9%、0 - 0.9%、0 - 0.6%、0.3 - 3.1%和0 - 0.6%。与“清洁”犬类活动区域的样本相比,维也纳“肮脏”犬类活动区域的样本总体寄生虫感染率(p = 0.003)和鞭虫感染率(p = 0.048)显著更高。维也纳人口密集区和人口密度较低区之间没有统计学上的显著差异。沃尔克斯多夫农村地区的样本总体寄生虫、鞭虫和等孢球虫属的感染率显著高于城郊的默德林区和维也纳(p = 0.000 - 0.039),而默德林区的样本贾第虫、犬肺线虫和毛细线虫的感染率显著高于维也纳的样本(p = 0.002 - 0.047)。寄生虫排泄情况是动态变化的,因此进行有代表性的采样和监测对于寄生虫监测至关重要。应告知犬主有关人畜共患病的风险,并鼓励他们清理犬类粪便并妥善处理,以降低其他犬类和人类的感染风险。