John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney School of Medicine, University of Sydney; Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney.
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth.
J Physiother. 2017 Oct;63(4):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
What is the effect of adding an intensive task-specific hand-training program involving functional electrical stimulation to a combination of usual care plus three 15-minute sessions per week of one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute tetraplegia?
A parallel group, randomised, controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated concealed block randomisation procedure to either a control or experimental intervention.
Seventy people with C2 to T1 motor complete or incomplete tetraplegia within 6 months of injury. Participants were recruited from seven spinal units in Australia and New Zealand.
Experimental participants received intensive training for one hand. Intensive training consisted of training with an instrumented exercise workstation in conjunction with functional electrical stimulation for 1hour per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Both groups received usual care and 15minutes of one-to-one hand therapy three times per week without functional electrical stimulation.
The primary outcome was the modified Action Research Arm Test reflecting arm and hand function, which was assessed at the end of the intervention, that is, 11 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were measured at 11 and 26 weeks.
Sixty-six (94%) participants completed the post-intervention assessment and were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The mean (SD) modified Action Research Arm Test score for experimental and control participants at the post-intervention assessment was 36.5 points (SD 16.0) and 33.2 points (SD 17.5), respectively, with an adjusted mean between-group difference of 0.9 points (95% CI -4.1 to 5.9).
Adding an intensive task-specific hand-training program involving functional electrical stimulation to a combination of usual care plus three 15-minute sessions per week of one-to-one hand therapy does not improve hand function in people with sub-acute tetraplegia.
Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry ACTRN12609000695202 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01086930. [Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Galea MP, Spinal Cord Injury Physical Activity (SCIPA) Hands On Trial Collaborators (2017) Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury ('Hands On'): a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 63: 197-204].
在亚急性四肢瘫痪患者中,将涉及功能性电刺激的强化任务特异性手部训练计划添加到常规护理和每周三次、每次 15 分钟的一对一手部治疗中,会产生什么效果?
一项平行组、随机对照试验。参与者通过计算机生成的隐蔽块随机分组程序以 1:1 的比例随机分配至对照组或实验组。
70 名损伤后 6 个月内 C2 至 T1 运动完全或不完全四肢瘫痪的患者。参与者是从澳大利亚和新西兰的 7 个脊髓单位招募的。
实验组接受单手强化训练。强化训练包括每天使用仪器化运动工作站进行训练,同时结合功能性电刺激,每周 5 天,每天 1 小时,共 8 周。两组均接受常规护理和每周三次、每次 15 分钟的无功能性电刺激一对一手部治疗。
主要结局指标是改良的动作研究上肢测试,反映上肢和手部功能,在干预结束时(即随机分组后 11 周)进行评估。次要结局指标在 11 周和 26 周时进行测量。
66 名(94%)参与者完成了干预后评估,并纳入主要意向治疗分析。实验组和对照组在干预后评估时的改良动作研究上肢测试评分分别为 36.5 分(SD 16.0)和 33.2 分(SD 17.5),组间平均差异为 0.9 分(95%CI-4.1 至 5.9)。
在常规护理加每周三次、每次 15 分钟的一对一手部治疗的基础上,增加一项涉及功能性电刺激的强化任务特异性手部训练计划,并不能改善亚急性四肢瘫痪患者的手部功能。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心 ACTRN12609000695202 和 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01086930。[Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Galea MP, Spinal Cord Injury Physical Activity (SCIPA) Hands On Trial Collaborators (2017) 早期强化手部康复并不优于亚急性脊髓损伤患者的常规护理加一对一手部治疗(“Hands On”):一项随机试验。《物理治疗杂志》63:197-204]。