What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? The continued search for the ideal hemodynamic monitoring device: Spending ourselves in a worthy cause and coming up short.
作者信息
Hofmann James P, Stroud Jason M, Papadimos Thomas J
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and the Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
出版信息
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):133-135. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_61_17.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? The continued search for the ideal hemodynamic monitoring device: Spending ourselves in a worthy cause and coming up short.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):133-135. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_61_17.
2
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? The ongoing debate on the optimal resuscitative fluid and monitoring parameters.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2013 Jul;3(3):167-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.119194.
3
Editor's Report: What's Now, What's New, and What's Coming.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):147-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.12.014.
4
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? Antibiotics in critical care: Therapeutic toolbox.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):105-109. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_81_19. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
What's new in critical illness and injury science? Resource allocation and very short intensive care unit stays.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022 Jul-Sep;12(3):119-120. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_61_22. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
6
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? Extubation Failure Predictors for 2016.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec;6(4):163-164. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.195391.
7
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? We must lead by hope….
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):75-76. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_37_17.
8
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? The quest for decisional objectivity and clinical precision in critical care: A neurosurgeon's perspective.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;7(4):185-187. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.219951.
9
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? Estrogen: Is it a new therapeutic paradigm for trauma-hemorrhagic shock?
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;6(2):53. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.183021.
10
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? Delirium, COVID-19, and critical illness.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):59-60. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_44_22. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
本文引用的文献
1
The pulmonary artery catheter in 2008 - A (finally) maturing modality?
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):172-176. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_57_17.
2
Data availability and feasibility of various techniques to predict response to volume expansion in critically ill patients.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):163-165. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.214412.
3
Comparison of pulmonary artery catheter, echocardiography, and arterial waveform analysis monitoring in predicting the hemodynamic state during and after cardiac surgery.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3):156-162. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.214411.
4
Early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock: A living systematic review.
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Increasing use of less-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in 3 specialty surgical intensive care units: a 5-year experience at a tertiary medical center.
J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):30-6. doi: 10.1177/0885066613498055. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
6
Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1774-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd.
7
Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):152-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f08d7.
8
Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):761-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen277. Epub 2008 Oct 12.
9
Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.
Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):172-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2331.
10
Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system.
Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R82. doi: 10.1186/cc6933. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
Zotero 插件