Dahlia K. Remler (
Sanders D. Korenman is a professor in the Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College, and a faculty affiliate at the CUNY Institute for Demographic Research.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Oct 1;36(10):1828-1837. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0331.
The effects of health insurance on poverty have been difficult to ascertain because US poverty measures have not taken into account the need for health care and the value of health benefits. We developed the first US poverty measure to include the need for health insurance and to count health insurance benefits as resources available to meet that need-in other words, a health-inclusive poverty measure. We estimated the direct effects of health insurance benefits on health-inclusive poverty for people younger than age sixty-five, comparing the impacts of different health insurance programs and of nonhealth means-tested cash and in-kind benefits, refundable tax credits, and nonhealth social insurance programs. Private health insurance benefits reduced poverty by 3.7 percentage points. Public health insurance benefits (from Medicare, Medicaid, and Affordable Care Act premium subsidies) accounted for nearly one-third of the overall poverty reduction from public benefits. Poor adults with neither children nor a disability experienced little poverty relief from public programs, and what relief they did receive came mostly from premium subsidies and other public health insurance benefits. Medicaid had a larger effect on child poverty than all nonhealth means-tested benefits combined.
医疗保险对贫困的影响一直难以确定,因为美国的贫困衡量标准没有考虑到医疗保健的需求和医疗保险福利的价值。我们制定了第一个包含医疗保险需求并将医疗保险福利视为满足这一需求的资源的美国贫困衡量标准,也就是说,这是一个包含健康因素的贫困衡量标准。我们估计了医疗保险福利对 65 岁以下人群的健康相关贫困的直接影响,比较了不同医疗保险计划以及非健康型现金和实物福利、可退还税收抵免和非健康型社会保险计划的影响。私人医疗保险福利使贫困率降低了 3.7 个百分点。公共医疗保险福利(来自医疗保险、医疗补助和平价医疗法案保费补贴)占公共福利整体减贫的近三分之一。没有子女或残疾的贫困成年人从公共计划中获得的贫困缓解作用很小,他们得到的缓解主要来自保费补贴和其他公共医疗保险福利。医疗补助对儿童贫困的影响大于所有非健康型有条件现金福利的总和。