• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经典型人群中自发心理化能力在自闭症谱系障碍症状高分与低分者之间的差异。

Spontaneous mentalizing in neurotypicals scoring high versus low on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder.

机构信息

Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.060. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.060
PMID:28972889
Abstract

Spontaneous mentalizing ability has been linked to symptoms severity in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here we investigated whether in neurotypicals, higher levels of ASD symptomatology could also be linked to lower levels of spontaneous mentalizing, by comparing neurotypicals scoring high with those scoring low on the short Autism Spectrum Quotient. Participants watched movies during which they, and another agent, formed beliefs about the location of an object. These beliefs could influence reaction times (RT) to that object in the outcome phase. We expected participants with more ASD symptoms to show less spontaneous mentalizing, as reflected by a smaller effect of the other agent's beliefs on RT patterns (the ToM index). In contrast, the effect of own beliefs on RTs, reflecting an egocentric bias, was expected to be larger in the high-scoring group. Results showed that groups differed in the effect of the agent's beliefs; the ToM index was highly significant in the low-scoring group, while being absent in the high-scoring group. No difference in egocentric bias was observed. These findings suggest that the relationship between levels of ASD symptomatology and spontaneous mentalizing is not only present in individuals with ASD, but also in the neurotypical population.

摘要

自发心理理论能力与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的症状严重程度有关。在这里,我们通过比较自闭症谱系商数得分高的和得分低的神经典型者,调查在神经典型者中,ASD 症状的严重程度是否也与自发心理理论能力的降低有关。参与者观看电影,在电影中,他们和另一个代理形成了对物体位置的信念。这些信念可能会影响结果阶段对该物体的反应时间(RT)。我们预计,具有更多 ASD 症状的参与者表现出较少的自发心理理论能力,这反映在其他代理的信念对 RT 模式的影响较小(心理理论指数)。相比之下,在高得分组中,自己的信念对 RTs 的影响,反映了自我中心偏见,预计会更大。结果表明,两组在代理信念的影响上存在差异;低得分组的心理理论指数非常显著,而高得分组则不存在。没有观察到自我中心偏见的差异。这些发现表明,ASD 症状水平与自发心理理论能力之间的关系不仅存在于 ASD 个体中,也存在于神经典型人群中。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous mentalizing in neurotypicals scoring high versus low on symptomatology of autism spectrum disorder.神经典型人群中自发心理化能力在自闭症谱系障碍症状高分与低分者之间的差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.060. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Brain activity for spontaneous and explicit mentalizing in adults with autism spectrum disorder: An fMRI study.自闭症谱系障碍成人自发和外显心理化的大脑活动:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Feb 17;18:475-484. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.016. eCollection 2018.
3
Measuring Mentalizing Ability: A Within-Subject Comparison between an Explicit and Implicit Version of a Ball Detection Task.测量心理理论能力:球检测任务的显性与隐性版本之间的受试者内比较。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0164373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164373. eCollection 2016.
4
Measuring spontaneous mentalizing with a ball detection task: putting the attention-check hypothesis by Phillips and colleagues (2015) to the test.用球探测任务测量自发性心理化:检验菲利普斯等人(2015 年)的注意力检查假设。
Psychol Res. 2020 Sep;84(6):1749-1757. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01181-7. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Deconstructing Theory-of-Mind Impairment in High-Functioning Adults with Autism.自闭症高功能成人心理理论损伤的解构。
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 4;29(3):513-519.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.039. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Theory of mind in SLI revisited: links with syntax, comparisons with ASD.重新审视特定语言障碍中的心理理论:与句法的联系,与自闭症谱系障碍的比较。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):816-830. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12317. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Abilities to Explicitly and Implicitly Infer Intentions from Actions in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍成人从动作中明确和隐含推断意图的能力。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 May;48(5):1712-1726. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3425-5.
8
The cerebellum is linked to theory of mind alterations in autism. A direct clinical and MRI comparison between individuals with autism and cerebellar neurodegenerative pathologies.小脑与自闭症的心理理论改变有关。自闭症患者与小脑神经退行性病变个体的直接临床和 MRI 比较。
Autism Res. 2021 Nov;14(11):2300-2313. doi: 10.1002/aur.2593. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
9
Simple Mindreading Abilities Predict Complex Theory of Mind: Developmental Delay in Autism Spectrum Disorders.简单的心理解读能力可预测复杂的心理理论:自闭症谱系障碍中的发育迟缓。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Sep;47(9):2743-2756. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3194-1.
10
Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍成人的心理理论测量
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Jul;47(7):1927-1941. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3080-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Can similarity of autistic traits promote neural synchronization?自闭症特质相似性能否促进神经同步?
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Nov;242(11):2633-2644. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06919-3. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Evaluative contexts facilitate implicit mentalizing: relation to the broader autism phenotype and mental health.评价语境促进内隐心理化:与广泛自闭症表型和心理健康的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 26;14(1):4697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55075-9.
3
Examining whether adults with autism spectrum disorder encounter multiple problems in theory of mind: a study based on meta-analysis.
探究患有自闭症谱系障碍的成年人在心理理论方面是否会遇到多重问题:一项基于荟萃分析的研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1740-1758. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02280-8. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Facial Imitation Improves Emotion Recognition in Adults with Different Levels of Sub-Clinical Autistic Traits.面部模仿可改善具有不同程度亚临床自闭症特征的成年人的情绪识别能力。
J Intell. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9010004.
5
Visibly constraining an agent modulates observers' automatic false-belief tracking.明显限制主体会调节观察者自动错误信念追踪。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68240-7.
6
Spontaneous Theory of Mind is reduced for nonhuman-like agents as compared to human-like agents.相较于类人型代理,非类人型代理的自发心理理论会有所减少。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1571-1580. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1000-0. Epub 2018 Apr 16.