Pugdahl K, Beniczky S, Wanscher B, Johnsen B, Qerama E, Ballegaard M, Benedek K, Juhl A, Ööpik M, Selmar P, Sønderborg J, Terney D, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Filadelfia, Dianalund, Denmark.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2205-2210. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
This study validates consensus criteria for localisation of ulnar neuropathy at elbow (UNE) developed by a taskforce of the Danish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology and compares them to the existing criteria from the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). The Danish criteria are based on combinations of conduction slowing in the segments of the elbow and forearm expressed in Z-scores, and difference between the segments in m/s. Examining fibres to several muscles and sensory fibres can increase the certainty of the localisation.
Diagnostic accuracy for UNE was evaluated on 181 neurophysiological studies of the ulnar nerve from 171 peer-reviewed patients from a mixed patient-group. The diagnostic reference standard was the consensus diagnosis based on all available clinical, laboratory, and electrodiagnostic information reached by a group of experienced Danish neurophysiologists.
The Danish criteria had high specificity (98.4%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (95.2%) and fair sensitivity (76.9%). Compared to the AANEM criteria, the Danish criteria had higher specificity (p<0.001) and lower sensitivity (p=0.02).
The Danish consensus criteria for UNE are very specific and have high PPV.
The Danish criteria for UNE are reliable and well suited for use in different centres as they are based on Z-scores.
本研究验证了由丹麦临床神经生理学协会的一个特别工作组制定的肘部尺神经病变(UNE)定位的共识标准,并将其与美国神经肌肉和电诊断医学协会(AANEM)的现有标准进行比较。丹麦标准基于以Z分数表示的肘部和前臂节段的传导减慢以及节段间以米/秒为单位的差异的组合。检查多条肌肉的纤维和感觉纤维可提高定位的确定性。
对来自混合患者组的171名经同行评审患者的181项尺神经神经生理学研究进行UNE诊断准确性评估。诊断参考标准是一组经验丰富的丹麦神经生理学家根据所有可用的临床、实验室和电诊断信息达成的共识诊断。
丹麦标准具有高特异性(98.4%)和阳性预测值(PPV)(95.2%)以及中等敏感性(76.9%)。与AANEM标准相比,丹麦标准具有更高的特异性(p<0.001)和更低的敏感性(p=0.02)。
丹麦UNE共识标准非常特异且具有高PPV。
丹麦UNE标准可靠且非常适合在不同中心使用,因为它们基于Z分数。