Casuso Rafael A, Plaza-Díaz Julio, Ruiz-Ojeda Francisco J, Aragón-Vela Jerónimo, Robles-Sanchez Cándido, Nordsborg Nikolai B, Hebberecht Marina, Salmeron Luis M, Huertas Jesus R
Department of Physiology, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology "José Mataix," Biomedical Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185494. eCollection 2017.
We aimed to test whether high-intensity high-volume training (HIHVT) swimming would induce more robust signaling than sprint interval training (SIT) swimming within the m. triceps brachii due to lower metabolic and oxidation. Nine well-trained swimmers performed the two training procedures on separate randomized days. Muscle biopsies from m. triceps brachii and blood samples were collected at three different time points: a) before the intervention (pre), b) immediately after the swimming procedures (post) and c) after 3 h of rest (3 h). Hydroperoxides, creatine kinase (CK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were quantified from blood samples, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) and the AMPKpTHR172/AMPK ratio were quantified by Western blot analysis. PGC-1α, sirtuin 3 (SIRT3), superoxide-dismutase 2 (SOD2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA levels were also quantified. SIT induced a higher release of LDH (p < 0.01 at all time points) and CK (p < 0.01 at post) than HIHVT, but neither SIT nor HIHVT altered systemic hydroperoxides. Additionally, neither SIRT3 nor SOD2 mRNA levels increased, while PGC-1α transcription increased at 3 h after SIT (p < 0.01) and after HIHVT (p < 0.001). However, PGC-1α protein was higher after HIHVT than after SIT (p < 0.05). Moreover, the AMPKpTHR172/AMPK ratio increased at post after SIT (p < 0.05), whereas this effect was delayed after HIHVT as it increased after 3 h (p < 0.05). In addition, VEGF transcription was higher in response to HIHVT (p < 0.05). In conclusion, SIT induces higher muscular stress than HIHVT without increasing systemic oxidation. In addition, HIHVT may induce more robust oxidative adaptations through PGC-1α and AMPK.
我们旨在测试高强度大容量训练(HIHVT)游泳是否会由于较低的代谢和氧化作用,比短跑间歇训练(SIT)游泳在肱三头肌中诱导更强有力的信号传导。九名训练有素的游泳运动员在不同的随机日子里进行这两种训练程序。在三个不同时间点采集肱三头肌的肌肉活检样本和血液样本:a)干预前(pre)、b)游泳程序结束后立即(post)和c)休息3小时后(3 h)。从血液样本中定量测定氢过氧化物、肌酸激酶(CK)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH),并通过蛋白质印迹分析定量测定过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子1α(PGC-1α)和AMPKpTHR172/AMPK比值。还定量测定了PGC-1α、沉默调节蛋白3(SIRT3)、超氧化物歧化酶2(SOD2)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的mRNA水平。与HIHVT相比,SIT诱导的LDH释放更高(所有时间点p < 0.01)和CK释放更高(post时p < 0.01),但SIT和HIHVT均未改变全身氢过氧化物水平。此外,SIRT3和SOD2的mRNA水平均未增加,而PGC-1α转录在SIT后3小时(p < 0.01)和HIHVT后(p < 0.001)增加。然而,HIHVT后PGC-1α蛋白高于SIT后(p < 0.05)。此外,SIT后post时AMPKpTHR172/AMPK比值增加(p < 0.05),而HIHVT后这种效应延迟,因为它在3小时后增加(p < 0.05)。此外,HIHVT引起的VEGF转录更高(p < 0.05)。总之,SIT比HIHVT诱导更高的肌肉应激,但不增加全身氧化。此外,HIHVT可能通过PGC-1α和AMPK诱导更强有力的氧化适应。