Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Dec 1;153(12):1249-1255. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3426.
Reticular veins are subdermal veins located in the lower limbs and are mainly associated with aesthetic complaints. Although sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice for reticular veins in the lower limbs, no consensus has been reached regarding to the optimal sclerosant.
To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 sclerosants used to treat reticular veins: 0.2% polidocanol diluted in 70% hypertonic glucose (HG) (group 1) vs 75% HG alone (group 2).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, randomized, triple-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial with patients randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio between the 2 treatment groups from March through December 2014, with 2 months' follow-up. The study was conducted in a single academic medical center. Eligible participants were all women, aged 18 to 69 years, who had at least 1 reticular vein with a minimum length of 10 cm in 1 of their lower limbs.
The patients underwent sclerotherapy in a single intervention with either 0.2% polidocanol plus 70% HG or 75% HG alone to eliminate reticular veins.
The primary efficacy end point was the disappearance of the reticular veins within 60 days after treatment with sclerotherapy. The reticular veins were measured on images obtained before treatment and after treatment using ImageJ software. Safety outcomes were analyzed immediately after treatment and 7 days and 60 days after treatment and included serious adverse events (eg, deep vein thrombosis and systemic complications) and minor adverse events (eg, pigmentation, edema, telangiectatic matting, and hematomas).
Ninety-three women completed the study, median (interquartile range) age 43.0 (24.0-61.0) years for group 1 and 41.0 (27.0-62.0) years for group 2. Sclerotherapy with 0.2% polidocanol plus 70% HG was significantly more effective than with 75% HG alone in eliminating reticular veins from the treated area (95.17% vs 85.40%; P < .001). No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Pigmentation was the most common minor adverse event, with a 3.53% treated-vein pigmentation length for group 1 and 7.09% for group 2, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .09).
Sclerotherapy with 0.2% polidocanol diluted in 70% HG was superior to 75% HG alone in sclerosing reticular veins, with no statistical difference for complications. Pigmentation occurred in both groups, with no statistical difference between them. No serious adverse events occurred in either group.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02054325.
网状静脉是位于下肢的皮下静脉,主要与美容投诉有关。虽然硬化疗法是治疗下肢网状静脉的首选方法,但对于最佳硬化剂尚未达成共识。
比较两种硬化剂治疗网状静脉的疗效和安全性:0.2%聚多卡醇稀释于 70%高渗葡萄糖(HG)中(第 1 组)与单独使用 75%HG(第 2 组)。
设计、设置和参与者:2014 年 3 月至 12 月,在单家学术医疗中心进行前瞻性、随机、三盲、对照、平行组临床试验,患者按 1:1 比例随机分配至两组治疗组,随访 2 个月。合格的参与者均为年龄在 18 至 69 岁之间的女性,其下肢至少有 1 条长度至少为 10cm 的网状静脉。
患者在单次干预中接受硬化疗法,使用 0.2%聚多卡醇加 70%HG 或单独使用 75%HG 消除网状静脉。
主要疗效终点是治疗后 60 天内网状静脉的消失。使用 ImageJ 软件在治疗前和治疗后获取的图像上测量网状静脉。安全性结果在治疗后立即以及治疗后 7 天和 60 天进行分析,包括严重不良事件(例如深静脉血栓形成和全身并发症)和轻微不良事件(例如色素沉着、水肿、毛细血管扩张状配布、血肿)。
93 名女性完成了研究,第 1 组的中位(四分位距)年龄为 43.0(24.0-61.0)岁,第 2 组为 41.0(27.0-62.0)岁。与单独使用 75%HG 相比,0.2%聚多卡醇加 70%HG 的硬化疗法在消除治疗区域的网状静脉方面明显更有效(95.17%对 85.40%;P<0.001)。两组均未发生严重不良事件。色素沉着是最常见的轻微不良事件,第 1 组的治疗静脉色素沉着长度为 3.53%,第 2 组为 7.09%,两组间无显著差异(P=0.09)。
0.2%聚多卡醇稀释于 70%HG 的硬化疗法在硬化网状静脉方面优于单独使用 75%HG,并发症无统计学差异。两组均发生色素沉着,但无统计学差异。两组均未发生严重不良事件。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT02054325。