文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经导管主动脉瓣与外科主动脉瓣在 PARTNER 试验中的纵向血流动力学比较。

Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1197-1206. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306.


DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306
PMID:28973520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710363/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis is growing rapidly. However, to our knowledge, the durability of these prostheses is incompletely defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the midterm hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study, we analyzed core laboratory-generated data from echocardiograms of all patients enrolled in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 1 Trial with successful TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR) obtained preimplantation and at 7 days, 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postimplantation. Patients from continued access observational studies were included for comparison. INTERVENTIONS: Successful implantation after randomization to TAVR vs SAVR (PARTNER 1A; TAVR, n = 321; SAVR, n = 313), TAVR vs medical treatment (PARTNER 1B; TAVR, n = 165), and continued access (TAVR, n = 1996). Five-year echocardiogram data were available for 424 patients after TAVR and 49 after SAVR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Death or reintervention for aortic valve structural indications, measured using aortic valve mean gradient, effective orifice area, Doppler velocity index, and evidence of hemodynamic deterioration by reintervention, adverse hemodynamics, or transvalvular regurgitation. RESULTS: Of 2795 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 84.5 (7.1) years, and 1313 (47.0%) were female. Population hemodynamic trends derived from nonlinear mixed-effects models showed small early favorable changes in the first few months post-TAVR, with a decrease of -2.9 mm Hg in aortic valve mean gradient, an increase of 0.028 in Doppler velocity index, and an increase of 0.09 cm2 in effective orifice area. There was relative stability at a median follow-up of 3.1 (maximum, 5) years. Moderate/severe transvalvular regurgitation was noted in 89 patients (3.7%) after TAVR and increased over time. Patients with SAVR showed no significant changes. In TAVR, death/reintervention was associated with lower ejection fraction, stroke volume index, and aortic valve mean gradient up to 3 years, with no association with Doppler velocity index or valve area. Reintervention occurred in 20 patients (0.8%) after TAVR and in 1 (0.3%) after SAVR and became less frequent over time. Reintervention was caused by structural deterioration of transcatheter heart valves in only 5 patients. Severely abnormal hemodynamics on echocardiograms were also infrequent and not associated with excess death or reintervention for either TAVR or SAVR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This large, core laboratory-based study of transcatheter heart valves revealed excellent durability of the transcatheter heart valves and SAVR. Abnormal findings in individual patients, suggestive of valve thrombosis or structural deterioration, were rare in this protocol-driven database and require further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00530894.

摘要

重要性:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的应用正在迅速增加。然而,据我们所知,这些假体的耐久性尚未完全确定。 目的:确定球囊扩张经导管心脏瓣膜的中期血液动力学性能。 设计、地点和参与者:在这项研究中,我们分析了来自所有成功接受 TAVR 或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的患者的核心实验室生成的超声心动图数据,这些患者来自于 Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves(PARTNER)1 试验,并在植入前、植入后 7 天、1 个月、6 个月以及 1、2、3、4 和 5 年进行了测量。包括继续接受观察性研究的患者进行比较。 干预措施:随机分组接受 TAVR 与 SAVR(PARTNER 1A;TAVR,n=321;SAVR,n=313)、TAVR 与药物治疗(PARTNER 1B;TAVR,n=165)以及继续接受治疗(TAVR,n=1996)的患者。5 年超声心动图数据可用于 424 例 TAVR 后患者和 49 例 SAVR 后患者。 主要结果和测量指标:因主动脉瓣结构性指征死亡或再次干预,通过再次干预、不良血液动力学或跨瓣反流来评估,使用主动脉瓣平均梯度、有效瓣口面积、多普勒速度指数来衡量。 结果:在 2795 例纳入的患者中,平均(标准差)年龄为 84.5(7.1)岁,1313 例(47.0%)为女性。来自非线性混合效应模型的人群血液动力学趋势显示,TAVR 后最初几个月内有较小的早期有利变化,主动脉瓣平均梯度降低 2.9mmHg,多普勒速度指数增加 0.028,有效瓣口面积增加 0.09cm2。中位数随访 3.1(最长 5)年后相对稳定。TAVR 后 89 例(3.7%)患者出现中度/重度跨瓣反流,并随时间增加。SAVR 患者没有明显变化。在 TAVR 中,死亡/再次干预与射血分数、每搏量指数和主动脉瓣平均梯度降低相关,直到 3 年,但与多普勒速度指数或瓣口面积无关。TAVR 后有 20 例(0.8%)患者和 1 例(0.3%)SAVR 后患者需要再次干预,随着时间的推移,再次干预的频率逐渐降低。仅 5 例患者因经导管心脏瓣膜结构性恶化而再次干预。超声心动图上严重异常的血液动力学也很少见,与 TAVR 或 SAVR 的额外死亡或再次干预无关。 结论和相关性:这项大型的基于核心实验室的经导管心脏瓣膜研究显示,经导管心脏瓣膜和 SAVR 的耐久性非常好。在这个协议驱动的数据库中,个别患者提示瓣膜血栓形成或结构性恶化的异常发现很少见,需要进一步研究。 试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00530894。

相似文献

[1]
Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.

JAMA Cardiol. 2017-11-1

[2]
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.

Circulation. 2020-5-12

[3]
Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019-2-12

[4]
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016-6

[5]
Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021-8

[6]
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016-6

[7]
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-4

[8]
Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013-12

[9]
Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: a longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort A of the PARTNER trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valves).

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013-4-23

[10]
5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2015-3-15

引用本文的文献

[1]
An approach to evaluating the impact of virtual specialty care: the Veterans Health Administration's clinical resource hub as case study.

JAMIA Open. 2025-5-20

[2]
Single-Centre Experience with the Balloon-Expandable Myval Transcatheter Aortic Valve System with the First 200 Patients: 30-Day and 1-Year Follow-Up.

J Clin Med. 2025-3-28

[3]
Leaflet Mechanical Stress in Different Designs and Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: An in Vitro Study.

Struct Heart. 2023-12-19

[4]
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is associated with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023-10-10

[5]
Comparison of middle-term valve durability between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023-9-13

[6]
Hemodynamic Performance of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: A Comprehensive Review.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-5-13

[7]
Pushing the limits for interventional treatment of aortic valve stenosis.

Herz. 2021-10

[8]
Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020-10-20

[9]
Mid-term outcomes of Sapien 3 versus Perimount Magna Ease for treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020-6-29

[10]
Structural durability of early-generation Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valves compared with surgical aortic valve replacement valves in heart valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020-6-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Long-Term Valve Performance of TAVR and SAVR: A Report From the PARTNER I Trial.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016-12-8

[2]
Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016-12-20

[3]
Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016-11-18

[4]
2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2017-3

[5]
3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016-4-3

[6]
Incidence, Timing, and Predictors of Valve Hemodynamic Deterioration After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Multicenter Registry.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016-2-16

[7]
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2016-7

[8]
Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Versus Structural Failure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015-12-1

[9]
Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.

N Engl J Med. 2015-10-5

[10]
Appropriate patient selection or health care rationing? Lessons from surgical aortic valve replacement in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves I trial.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015-6-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索