• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.经导管主动脉瓣与外科主动脉瓣在 PARTNER 试验中的纵向血流动力学比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1197-1206. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306.
2
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低危患者中的超声心动图结果:PARTNER 3 试验。
Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):1527-1537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
3
Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.低手术风险患者行经导管和外科生物瓣主动脉瓣膜的耐久性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.083.
4
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
5
Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后血流对人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
6
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者随机接受经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的两年结果:全人群北欧主动脉瓣干预随机临床试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.
7
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
8
Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗高危主动脉瓣狭窄合并左心室功能不全患者的疗效:主动脉经导管瓣膜置入(PARTNER)试验(A队列)结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(6):604-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000650. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: a longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort A of the PARTNER trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valves).经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:PARTNER 试验(主动脉经导管瓣膜置换术)A 队列的超声心动图参数的纵向研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.087. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄高危患者的 5 年结果(PARTNER 1):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2477-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60308-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
An approach to evaluating the impact of virtual specialty care: the Veterans Health Administration's clinical resource hub as case study.一种评估虚拟专科护理影响的方法:以退伍军人健康管理局的临床资源中心为例进行研究。
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 20;8(3):ooaf038. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf038. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Single-Centre Experience with the Balloon-Expandable Myval Transcatheter Aortic Valve System with the First 200 Patients: 30-Day and 1-Year Follow-Up.使用球囊扩张式Myval经导管主动脉瓣系统治疗首批200例患者的单中心经验:30天和1年随访
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 28;14(7):2323. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072323.
3
Leaflet Mechanical Stress in Different Designs and Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: An in Vitro Study.不同设计和代次的经导管主动脉瓣的瓣叶机械应力:一项体外研究
Struct Heart. 2023 Dec 19;8(2):100262. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100262. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is associated with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.N 末端脑利钠肽前体与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的临床结局相关。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 10;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02391-2.
5
Comparison of middle-term valve durability between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的中期瓣膜耐久性比较:对随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 13;10:1242608. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1242608. eCollection 2023.
6
Hemodynamic Performance of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: A Comprehensive Review.经导管主动脉瓣的血流动力学性能:综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 13;13(10):1731. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101731.
7
Pushing the limits for interventional treatment of aortic valve stenosis.为主动脉瓣狭窄的介入治疗推波助澜。
Herz. 2021 Oct;46(5):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00059-021-05057-8. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020.生物瓣心脏瓣膜的退行性变:2020 年更新。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e018506. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018506. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
Mid-term outcomes of Sapien 3 versus Perimount Magna Ease for treatment of severe aortic stenosis.Sapien 3与Perimount Magna Ease治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的中期结果
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 29;15(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01203-1.
10
Structural durability of early-generation Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valves compared with surgical aortic valve replacement valves in heart valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏瓣膜手术中早期经导管主动脉瓣置换瓣膜与外科主动脉瓣置换瓣膜的结构耐久性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01170-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Valve Performance of TAVR and SAVR: A Report From the PARTNER I Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的长期瓣膜性能:来自PARTNER I试验的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.004.
2
Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis.人工心脏瓣膜血栓形成。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 20;68(24):2670-2689. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.958.
3
Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve.三尖瓣型牛心包主动脉瓣中期、多中心临床及血流动力学结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):561-569.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.《胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册中心2016年年报》
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar;103(3):1021-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.接受外科或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的高危患者的 3 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 7;67(22):2565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.506. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
6
Incidence, Timing, and Predictors of Valve Hemodynamic Deterioration After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Multicenter Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣叶血流动力学恶化的发生率、时间和预测因素:多中心注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 16;67(6):644-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.097.
7
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中年成人机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):315-27. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.092. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Versus Structural Failure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors.生物瓣血栓形成与结构失效:临床和超声心动图预测因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2285-2294. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.022.
9
Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.生物瓣主动脉瓣叶可能存在亚临床血栓。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2015-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509233. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
10
Appropriate patient selection or health care rationing? Lessons from surgical aortic valve replacement in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves I trial.恰当的患者选择还是医疗资源配置?来自经导管主动脉瓣置换术 Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves I 试验的经验教训。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):557-68.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.073. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

经导管主动脉瓣与外科主动脉瓣在 PARTNER 试验中的纵向血流动力学比较。

Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1197-1206. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306
PMID:28973520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710363/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis is growing rapidly. However, to our knowledge, the durability of these prostheses is incompletely defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the midterm hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study, we analyzed core laboratory-generated data from echocardiograms of all patients enrolled in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 1 Trial with successful TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR) obtained preimplantation and at 7 days, 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postimplantation. Patients from continued access observational studies were included for comparison.

INTERVENTIONS

Successful implantation after randomization to TAVR vs SAVR (PARTNER 1A; TAVR, n = 321; SAVR, n = 313), TAVR vs medical treatment (PARTNER 1B; TAVR, n = 165), and continued access (TAVR, n = 1996). Five-year echocardiogram data were available for 424 patients after TAVR and 49 after SAVR.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Death or reintervention for aortic valve structural indications, measured using aortic valve mean gradient, effective orifice area, Doppler velocity index, and evidence of hemodynamic deterioration by reintervention, adverse hemodynamics, or transvalvular regurgitation.

RESULTS

Of 2795 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 84.5 (7.1) years, and 1313 (47.0%) were female. Population hemodynamic trends derived from nonlinear mixed-effects models showed small early favorable changes in the first few months post-TAVR, with a decrease of -2.9 mm Hg in aortic valve mean gradient, an increase of 0.028 in Doppler velocity index, and an increase of 0.09 cm2 in effective orifice area. There was relative stability at a median follow-up of 3.1 (maximum, 5) years. Moderate/severe transvalvular regurgitation was noted in 89 patients (3.7%) after TAVR and increased over time. Patients with SAVR showed no significant changes. In TAVR, death/reintervention was associated with lower ejection fraction, stroke volume index, and aortic valve mean gradient up to 3 years, with no association with Doppler velocity index or valve area. Reintervention occurred in 20 patients (0.8%) after TAVR and in 1 (0.3%) after SAVR and became less frequent over time. Reintervention was caused by structural deterioration of transcatheter heart valves in only 5 patients. Severely abnormal hemodynamics on echocardiograms were also infrequent and not associated with excess death or reintervention for either TAVR or SAVR.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This large, core laboratory-based study of transcatheter heart valves revealed excellent durability of the transcatheter heart valves and SAVR. Abnormal findings in individual patients, suggestive of valve thrombosis or structural deterioration, were rare in this protocol-driven database and require further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00530894.

摘要

重要性

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的应用正在迅速增加。然而,据我们所知,这些假体的耐久性尚未完全确定。

目的

确定球囊扩张经导管心脏瓣膜的中期血液动力学性能。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项研究中,我们分析了来自所有成功接受 TAVR 或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的患者的核心实验室生成的超声心动图数据,这些患者来自于 Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves(PARTNER)1 试验,并在植入前、植入后 7 天、1 个月、6 个月以及 1、2、3、4 和 5 年进行了测量。包括继续接受观察性研究的患者进行比较。

干预措施

随机分组接受 TAVR 与 SAVR(PARTNER 1A;TAVR,n=321;SAVR,n=313)、TAVR 与药物治疗(PARTNER 1B;TAVR,n=165)以及继续接受治疗(TAVR,n=1996)的患者。5 年超声心动图数据可用于 424 例 TAVR 后患者和 49 例 SAVR 后患者。

主要结果和测量指标

因主动脉瓣结构性指征死亡或再次干预,通过再次干预、不良血液动力学或跨瓣反流来评估,使用主动脉瓣平均梯度、有效瓣口面积、多普勒速度指数来衡量。

结果

在 2795 例纳入的患者中,平均(标准差)年龄为 84.5(7.1)岁,1313 例(47.0%)为女性。来自非线性混合效应模型的人群血液动力学趋势显示,TAVR 后最初几个月内有较小的早期有利变化,主动脉瓣平均梯度降低 2.9mmHg,多普勒速度指数增加 0.028,有效瓣口面积增加 0.09cm2。中位数随访 3.1(最长 5)年后相对稳定。TAVR 后 89 例(3.7%)患者出现中度/重度跨瓣反流,并随时间增加。SAVR 患者没有明显变化。在 TAVR 中,死亡/再次干预与射血分数、每搏量指数和主动脉瓣平均梯度降低相关,直到 3 年,但与多普勒速度指数或瓣口面积无关。TAVR 后有 20 例(0.8%)患者和 1 例(0.3%)SAVR 后患者需要再次干预,随着时间的推移,再次干预的频率逐渐降低。仅 5 例患者因经导管心脏瓣膜结构性恶化而再次干预。超声心动图上严重异常的血液动力学也很少见,与 TAVR 或 SAVR 的额外死亡或再次干预无关。

结论和相关性

这项大型的基于核心实验室的经导管心脏瓣膜研究显示,经导管心脏瓣膜和 SAVR 的耐久性非常好。在这个协议驱动的数据库中,个别患者提示瓣膜血栓形成或结构性恶化的异常发现很少见,需要进一步研究。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00530894。