Persona Paolo, Saraceni Elisabetta, Facchin Francesca, Petranzan Enrico, Parotto Matteo, Baratto Fabio, Ori Carlo, Rossi Sandra
Emergency Department, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Via V. Gallucci 13, 35121, Padova, Italy.
Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Aug;32(4):677-681. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0066-3. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
The measurement of cardiac output (CO) may be useful to improve the assessment of hemodynamics during simulated scenarios. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of introducing an uncalibrated pulse contour device (MostCare, Vytech, Vygon, Padova, Italy) into the simulation environment. MostCare device was plugged to a clinical monitor and connected to the METI human patient simulator (HPS) to obtain a continuous arterial waveform analysis and CO calculation. In six different simulated clinical scenarios (baseline, ventricular failure, vasoplegic shock, hypertensive crisis, hypovolemic shock and aortic stenosis), the HPS-CO and the MostCare-CO were simultaneously recorded. The level of concordance between the two methods was assessed by the Bland and Altman analysis. 150-paired CO values were obtained. The HPS-CO values ranged from 2.3 to 6.6 L min and the MostCare-CO values from 2.8 to 6.4 L min. The mean difference between HPS-CO and MostCare-CO was - 0.3 L min and the limits of agreement were - 1.5 and 0.9 L min. The percentage of error was 23%. A good correlation between HPS-CO and MostCare-CO was observed in each scenario of the study (r = 0.88). Although MostCare-CO tended to underestimate the CO over the study period, good agreements were found between the two methods. Therefore, a pulse contour device can be integrated into the simulation environment, offering the opportunity to create new simulated clinical settings.
在模拟场景中,心输出量(CO)的测量可能有助于改善血流动力学评估。本研究的目的是评估将未校准的脉搏轮廓装置(MostCare,Vytech,Vygon,意大利帕多瓦)引入模拟环境的可行性。将MostCare装置连接到临床监护仪,并与METI人体患者模拟器(HPS)相连,以获得连续的动脉波形分析和心输出量计算。在六种不同的模拟临床场景(基线、心力衰竭、血管麻痹性休克、高血压危象、低血容量性休克和主动脉狭窄)中,同时记录HPS-CO和MostCare-CO。通过Bland和Altman分析评估两种方法之间的一致性水平。获得了150对心输出量值。HPS-CO值范围为2.3至6.6L/min,MostCare-CO值范围为2.8至6.4L/min。HPS-CO与MostCare-CO之间的平均差值为-0.3L/min,一致性界限为-1.5和0.9L/min。误差百分比为23%。在研究的每个场景中,HPS-CO与MostCare-CO之间均观察到良好的相关性(r = 0.88)。尽管在研究期间MostCare-CO倾向于低估心输出量,但两种方法之间仍发现有良好的一致性。因此,脉搏轮廓装置可以集成到模拟环境中,为创建新的模拟临床场景提供机会。