Suppr超能文献

关于轮班工作与特定肥胖类型风险的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis on shift work and risks of specific obesity types.

机构信息

JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong.

Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Obes Rev. 2018 Jan;19(1):28-40. doi: 10.1111/obr.12621. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Abstract

AIMS

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the associations between shift work patterns and risks of specific types of obesity.

METHODS

PubMed was searched until March 2017 for observational studies that examined the relationships between shift work patterns and obesity. Odds ratio for obesity was extracted using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Subgroup meta-analyses were carried out for study design, specific obesity types and characteristics of shift work pattern.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall odds ratio of night shift work was 1.23 (95% confidence interval = 1.17-1.29) for risk of obesity/overweight. Cross-sectional studies showed a higher risk of 1.26 than those with the cohort design (risk ratio = 1.10). Shift workers had a higher frequency of developing abdominal obesity (odds ratio = 1.35) than other obesity types. Permanent night workers demonstrated a 29% higher risk than rotating shift workers (odds ratio 1.43 vs. 1.14).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed the risks of night shift work for the development of overweight and obesity with a potential gradient association suggested, especially for abdominal obesity. Modification of working schedules is recommended, particularly for prolonged permanent night work. More accurate and detailed measurements on shift work patterns should be conducted in future research.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了轮班工作模式与特定类型肥胖风险之间的关系。

方法

截至 2017 年 3 月,我们在 PubMed 上检索了观察性研究,这些研究检查了轮班工作模式与肥胖之间的关系。使用固定效应或随机效应模型提取肥胖的比值比。进行了亚组荟萃分析,以研究设计、特定肥胖类型和轮班工作模式特征为分类依据。

结果

本荟萃分析共纳入 28 项研究。夜班工作的总体比值比为 1.23(95%置信区间为 1.17-1.29),肥胖/超重风险增加。横断面研究显示的风险高于队列设计(风险比=1.10)。轮班工作者发生腹型肥胖的频率更高(比值比=1.35),而非其他肥胖类型。与轮班工作者相比,固定夜班工人的风险增加 29%(比值比 1.43 比 1.14)。

结论

本荟萃分析证实了夜班工作与超重和肥胖发展之间的风险关联,且存在潜在的梯度关联,尤其是腹型肥胖。建议修改工作时间表,特别是对于长期固定夜班工作。未来的研究应更准确和详细地测量轮班工作模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验