Kondili Loreta A, Gaeta Giovanni Battista, Brunetto Maurizia Rossana, Di Leo Alfredo, Iannone Andrea, Santantonio Teresa Antonia, Giammario Adele, Raimondo Giovanni, Filomia Roberto, Coppola Carmine, Amoruso Daniela Caterina, Blanc Pierluigi, Del Pin Barbara, Chemello Liliana, Cavalletto Luisa, Morisco Filomena, Donnarumma Laura, Rumi Maria Grazia, Gasbarrini Antonio, Siciliano Massimo, Massari Marco, Corsini Romina, Coco Barbara, Madonia Salvatore, Cannizzaro Marco, Zignego Anna Linda, Monti Monica, Russo Francesco Paolo, Zanetto Alberto, Persico Marcello, Masarone Mario, Villa Erica, Bernabucci Veronica, Taliani Gloria, Biliotti Elisa, Chessa Luchino, Pasetto Maria Cristina, Andreone Pietro, Margotti Marzia, Brancaccio Giuseppina, Ieluzzi Donatella, Borgia Guglielmo, Zappulo Emanuela, Calvaruso Vincenza, Petta Salvatore, Falzano Loredana, Quaranta Maria Giovanna, Weimer Liliana Elena, Rosato Stefano, Vella Stefano, Giannini Edoardo Giovanni
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0185728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185728. eCollection 2017.
Few data are available on the virological and clinical outcomes of advanced liver disease patients retreated after first-line DAA failure.
To evaluate DAA failure incidence and the retreatment clinical impact in patients treated in the advanced liver disease stage.
Data on HCV genotype, liver disease severity, and first and second line DAA regimens were prospectively collected in consecutive patients who reached the 12-week post-treatment and retreatment evaluations from January 2015 to December 2016 in 23 of the PITER network centers.
Among 3,830 patients with advanced fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis, 139 (3.6%) failed to achieve SVR. Genotype 3, bilirubin levels >1.5mg/dl, platelet count <120,000/mm3 and the sofosbuvir+ribavirin regimen were independent predictors of failure by logistic regression analysis. The failure rate was 7.6% for patients treated with regimens that are no longer recommended or considered suboptimal (sofosbuvir+ribavirin or simeprevir+sofosbuvir±ribavirin), whereas 1.4% for regimens containing sofosbuvir combined with daclatasvir or ledipasvir or other DAAs. Of the patients who failed to achieve SVR, 72 (51.8%) were retreated with a second DAA regimen, specifically 38 (52.7%) with sofosbuvir+daclatasvir, 27 (37.5%) with sofosbuvir+ledipasvir, and 7 (9.7%) with other DAAs ±ribavirin. Among these, 69 (96%) patients achieved SVR12 and 3 (4%) failed. During a median time of 6 months (range: 5-14 months) between failure and the second DAA therapy, the Child-Pugh class worsened in 12 (16.7%) patients: from A to B in 10 patients (19.6%) and from B to C in 2 patients (10.5%), whereas it did not change in the remaining 60 patients. Following the retreatment SVR12 (median time of 6 months; range: 3-12 months), the Child-Pugh class improved in 17 (23.6%) patients: from B to A in 14 (19.4%) patients, from C to A in 1 patient (1.4%) and from C to B in 2 (2.9%) patients; it remained unchanged in 53 patients (73.6%) and worsened in 2 (2.8%) patients. Of patients who were retreated, 3 (4%) had undergone OLT before retreatment (all reached SVR12 following retreatment) and 2 (2.8%) underwent OLT after having achieved retreatment SVR12. Two (70%) of the 3 patients who failed to achieve SVR12 after retreatment, and 2 (2.8%) of the 69 patients who achieved retreatment SVR12 died from liver failure (Child-Pugh class deteriorated from B to C) or HCC complications.
Failure rate following the first DAA regimen in patients with advanced disease is similar to or lower than that reported in clinical trials, although the majority of patients were treated with suboptimal regimens. Interim findings showed that worsening of liver function after failure, in terms of Child Pugh class deterioration, was improved by successful retreatment in about one third of retreated patients within a short follow-up period; however, in some advanced liver disease patients, clinical outcomes (Child Pugh class, HCC development, liver failure and death) were independent of viral eradication.
关于一线直接抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗失败后接受再治疗的晚期肝病患者的病毒学和临床结局的数据较少。
评估晚期肝病阶段接受治疗患者的DAA治疗失败发生率及再治疗的临床影响。
前瞻性收集2015年1月至2016年12月期间在PITER网络的23个中心接受治疗并完成治疗后12周和再治疗评估的连续患者的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型、肝病严重程度以及一线和二线DAA治疗方案的数据。
在3830例进展期肝纤维化(F3)或肝硬化患者中,139例(3.6%)未实现持续病毒学应答(SVR)。经逻辑回归分析,基因型3、胆红素水平>1.5mg/dl、血小板计数<120,000/mm³以及索磷布韦+利巴韦林治疗方案是治疗失败的独立预测因素。使用不再推荐或被认为次优的治疗方案(索磷布韦+利巴韦林或simeprevir+索磷布韦±利巴韦林)治疗的患者失败率为7.6%,而包含索磷布韦联合达卡他韦或来迪派韦或其他DAA的治疗方案失败率为1.4%。在未实现SVR的患者中,72例(51.8%)接受了第二种DAA方案再治疗,具体为38例(52.7%)接受索磷布韦+达卡他韦治疗,27例(37.5%)接受索磷布韦+来迪派韦治疗,7例(9.7%)接受其他DAA±利巴韦林治疗。其中,69例(96%)患者实现了12周SVR,3例(4%)失败。在治疗失败与第二次DAA治疗之间的中位时间为6个月(范围:5 - 14个月),12例(16.7%)患者的Child-Pugh分级恶化:10例(19.6%)从A级变为B级,2例(10.5%)从B级变为C级,其余60例患者未改变。再治疗实现12周SVR后(中位时间6个月;范围:3 - 12个月),17例(23.6%)患者的Child-Pugh分级改善:14例(19.4%)从B级变为A级,1例(1.4%)从C级变为A级,2例(2.9%)从C级变为B级;53例(73.6%)患者保持不变,2例(2.8%)患者恶化。在接受再治疗的患者中,3例(4%)在再治疗前接受了肝移植(所有患者再治疗后均实现了12周SVR),2例(2.8%)在实现再治疗12周SVR后接受了肝移植。再治疗后未实现12周SVR的3例患者中的2例(70%)以及实现再治疗12周SVR的69例患者中的2例(2.8%)死于肝衰竭(Child-Pugh分级从B级恶化为C级)或肝癌并发症。
晚期疾病患者接受第一种DAA治疗方案后的失败率与临床试验报告的相似或更低,尽管大多数患者接受的是次优治疗方案。中期研究结果表明,在短期随访期内,约三分之一接受再治疗的患者通过成功再治疗改善了治疗失败后肝功能的恶化情况(Child-Pugh分级恶化);然而,在一些晚期肝病患者中,临床结局(Child-Pugh分级、肝癌发生、肝衰竭和死亡)与病毒清除无关。