Kim Yeon Joo, Byun Sang Jun, Ahn Hanjong, Kim Choung-Soo, Hong Beom-Sik, Yoo Sangjun, Lee Jae-Lyun, Kim Young Seok
Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 25;8(40):68996-69004. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16576. eCollection 2017 Sep 15.
Although radical cystectomy (RC) is considered as the standard therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), trimodal therapy (TMT) combining transurethral resection of the tumor with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is increasingly recommended as an alternative approach for bladder preservation. In the absence of randomized trials, we compared the clinical outcomes between RC and TMT using propensity score matching with 50 patients in the RC arm and 29 patients in the TMT arm. With respective median follow-up periods of 23 and 32 months for the RC and TMT groups, 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (58% vs. 67%), overall survival (56% vs. 57%), and cancer-specific survival (69% . 63%) rates between the RC and TMT groups, respectively, were similar. However, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival was significantly better in the RC group than in the TMT group (74% . 35%). Following TMT, acute grade 3 hematological ( = 2) and late grade 3 genitourinary ( = 1) toxicities were reported. These findings demonstrated that oncological outcomes of TMT were comparable with those of RC, except for poorer local control. Large-scale, randomized trials are warranted to confirm the findings of the present retrospective comparison and to guide toward best treatment options.
尽管根治性膀胱切除术(RC)被视为肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的标准治疗方法,但将经尿道肿瘤切除术与放疗和化疗相结合的三联疗法(TMT)作为一种保留膀胱的替代方法越来越受到推荐。在缺乏随机试验的情况下,我们使用倾向评分匹配法比较了RC组50例患者和TMT组29例患者的临床结果。RC组和TMT组的中位随访期分别为23个月和32个月,RC组和TMT组之间的5年无远处转移生存率(58%对67%)、总生存率(56%对57%)和癌症特异性生存率(69%对63%)相似。然而,RC组的5年无局部复发生存率显著高于TMT组(74%对35%)。TMT后,报告了2例急性3级血液学毒性和1例晚期3级泌尿生殖系统毒性。这些结果表明,除了局部控制较差外,TMT的肿瘤学结果与RC相当。有必要进行大规模随机试验以证实本回顾性比较的结果,并指导最佳治疗方案的选择。