Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergency Medicine and Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Rheumatology Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;37(2):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3846-8. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab, abatacept, and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi), in the Italian real-world setting of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The records of adult RA patients from the Italian biologics' registry Gruppo Italiano Studio Early Arthritis (GISEA) were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were obtained at entry. The disease remission rate (28-joint disease activity score calculated using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] ≤ 2.6) and frequency of adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at 2 years. From 1999 to 2014, 7539 patients were treated with biologics (61.3% in first- and 22.6% in second-line), 68% of cases received TNFi, 9.1% tocilizumab, and 8.6% abatacept. Treatment groups showed a similar DAS28 at entry. As first-line, tocilizumab induced a significantly higher remission rate than abatacept or TNFi at 6 (51 vs 23.3 and 26.2%, respectively; p < 0.0001) and 24 months (52.3 vs 33.3 and 34.4%, respectively; p < 0.01). A similar pattern was observed in later lines. The most common AEs reported were infections, reactions to biologics (more frequent among TNFi-treated patients), increased transaminase (more frequent among TCZ-treated patients), and cardiovascular events. In clinical practice, TCZ induced a rapid and long-lasting remission and in a higher percentage of patients compared to abatacept and TNFi, with a good safety profile.
评估托珠单抗、阿巴西普和肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂(TNFi)在意大利类风湿关节炎(RA)真实世界环境中的长期疗效和安全性。分析了来自意大利生物制剂注册研究早期关节炎组(GISEA)的成年 RA 患者的记录。在入组时获得了人口统计学和临床数据。在第 2 年评估疾病缓解率(使用红细胞沉降率(ESR)计算的 28 个关节疾病活动评分[DAS28-ESR]≤2.6)和不良事件(AE)的频率。1999 年至 2014 年,7539 例患者接受了生物制剂治疗(一线治疗 61.3%,二线治疗 22.6%),68%的病例接受了 TNFi,9.1%的患者接受了托珠单抗,8.6%的患者接受了阿巴西普。治疗组在入组时具有相似的 DAS28。作为一线治疗,托珠单抗诱导缓解的缓解率明显高于阿巴西普或 TNFi,在第 6(51%比 23.3%和 26.2%,分别;p<0.0001)和 24 个月(52.3%比 33.3%和 34.4%,分别;p<0.01)时更高。在后续治疗线中也观察到类似的模式。报告的最常见 AE 是感染、生物制剂反应(在接受 TNFi 治疗的患者中更常见)、转氨酶升高(在接受 TCZ 治疗的患者中更常见)和心血管事件。在临床实践中,与阿巴西普和 TNFi 相比,TCZ 诱导缓解更快、持续时间更长,且安全性良好。