Tabata Kazuhiro, Mori Ichiro, Sasaki Takeshi, Itoh Tomoo, Shiraishi Taizo, Yoshimi Naoki, Maeda Ichiro, Harada Oi, Taniyama Kiyomi, Taniyama Daiki, Watanabe Mika, Mikami Yoshiki, Sato Shuntaro, Kashima Yukio, Fujimura Shota, Fukuoka Junya
Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki.
Department of Pathology, International University of Health and Welfare, Mita Hospital.
Pathol Int. 2017 Nov;67(11):547-554. doi: 10.1111/pin.12590. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Several reports have demonstrated the use of whole-slide imaging (WSI) for primary pathological diagnosis, but no such studies have been published from Asia. We retrospectively collected 1070 WSI specimens from 900 biopsies and small surgeries conducted in nine hospitals. Nine pathologists, who participated in this study, trained for the College of American Pathologists guidelines, reviewed the specimens and made diagnoses based on digitized, 20× or 40× optically magnified images with a WSI scanner. After a washout interval of over 2 weeks, the same observers reviewed conventional glass slides and diagnosed them by light microscopy. Discrepancies between microscopy- and WSI-based diagnoses were evaluated at the individual institutes, and discrepant cases were further reviewed by all pathologists. Nine diagnoses (0.9%) showed major discrepancies with significant clinical differences between the WSI- and microscopy-based diagnoses, and 37 (3.5%) minor discrepancies occurred without a clinical difference. Eight out of nine diagnoses with a major discrepancy were considered concordant with the microscopy-based diagnoses. No association was observed between the level of discrepancy and the organ type, collection method, or digitized optical magnification. Our results indicate the availability of WSI-based primary diagnosis of biopsies and small surgeries in routine daily practice.
已有多篇报告展示了全切片成像(WSI)在原发性病理诊断中的应用,但亚洲尚未发表此类研究。我们回顾性收集了来自九家医院900例活检和小型手术的1070份WSI标本。参与本研究的九位病理学家按照美国病理学家学会的指南进行培训,通过WSI扫描仪,基于数字化的20倍或40倍光学放大图像对标本进行审查并做出诊断。经过两周多的洗脱期后,相同的观察者对传统载玻片进行审查,并通过光学显微镜进行诊断。在各个机构评估基于显微镜和WSI诊断之间的差异,存在差异的病例由所有病理学家进一步审查。九例诊断(0.9%)显示出主要差异,基于WSI和显微镜的诊断之间存在显著临床差异,37例(3.5%)出现微小差异但无临床差异。九例有主要差异的诊断中有八例被认为与基于显微镜的诊断一致。差异程度与器官类型、采集方法或数字化光学放大倍数之间未观察到关联。我们的结果表明,在日常实践中,基于WSI的活检和小型手术原发性诊断是可行的。