• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用和披露患者保密信息与英国普通法:有效同意的信息要求有哪些?

Using and Disclosing Confidential Patient Information and The English Common Law: What are the Information Requirements of a Valid Consent?

作者信息

Chico Victoria, Taylor Mark J

机构信息

School of Law, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3?7ND, UK.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2018 Feb 1;26(1):51-72. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx038.

DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwx038
PMID:28981744
Abstract

The National Health Service in England and Wales is dependent upon the flow of confidential patient data. In the context of consent to the use of patient health data, insistence on the requirements of an 'informed' consent that are difficult to achieve will drive reliance on alternatives to consent. Here we argue that one can obtain a valid consent to the disclosure of confidential patient data, such that this disclosure would not amount to a breach of the common law duty of confidentiality, having provided less information than would typically be associated with an 'informed consent'. This position protects consent as a practicable legal basis for disclosure from debilitating uncertainty or impracticability and, perhaps counter-intuitively, promotes patient autonomy.

摘要

英格兰和威尔士的国民医疗服务体系依赖于患者机密数据的流动。在同意使用患者健康数据的背景下,坚持难以实现的“知情”同意要求将促使人们依赖同意的替代方式。在此我们认为,在提供的信息少于通常与“知情同意”相关的信息的情况下,仍可获得对披露患者机密数据的有效同意,这样的披露不会构成违反普通法上的保密义务。这一立场将同意作为披露的可行法律依据,使其免受令人衰弱的不确定性或不可行性的影响,而且也许与直觉相反的是,它促进了患者的自主权。

相似文献

1
Using and Disclosing Confidential Patient Information and The English Common Law: What are the Information Requirements of a Valid Consent?使用和披露患者保密信息与英国普通法:有效同意的信息要求有哪些?
Med Law Rev. 2018 Feb 1;26(1):51-72. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx038.
2
Problems of capacity, consent and confidentiality.能力、同意和保密问题。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;27(1):59-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
3
Signalling Standards for Progress: Bridging the Divide Between a Valid Consent to Use Patient Data Under Data Protection Law and the Common Law Duty of Confidentiality.进展的信号标准:弥合数据保护法下使用患者数据的有效同意与普通法保密义务之间的差距。
Med Law Rev. 2021 Oct 8;29(3):411-445. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwab014.
4
LEGAL BASES FOR DISCLOSING CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN HEALTH PROTECTION AND HEALTH IMPROVEMENT.为公共卫生披露患者保密信息的法律依据:区分健康保护与健康改善
Med Law Rev. 2015 Summer;23(3):348-74. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv018. Epub 2015 May 20.
5
Lawful disclosure of confidential information.机密信息的合法披露。
Br J Nurs. 2005;14(18):984-5. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.18.19887.
6
Medical information, confidentiality and a child's right to privacy.医疗信息、保密与儿童隐私权。
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2003 Sep;23(3):510-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00224.x.
7
Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Disclosure of Health Data.健康数据隐私与披露的合理预期
Med Law Rev. 2019 Aug 1;27(3):432-460. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwz009.
8
Confidence matters: the rise and fall of informational autonomy in medical law.信心至关重要:医疗法中信息自主权的兴衰
Med Law Rev. 2003 Summer;11(2):208-36. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/11.2.208.
9
One step forward, two steps back? The GMC, the common law and 'informed' consent.进两步,退一步?GMC、普通法与“知情”同意。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):494-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.032862.
10
The paradox of confidential communications.保密通信的悖论。
Am J Psychother. 1993 Winter;47(1):1-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1993.47.1.1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Principle-Based Approach to Visual Identification Systems for Hospitalized People with Dementia.基于原则的住院痴呆患者视觉识别系统方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Jun;21(2):331-344. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10315-x. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
Reasonable expectations of privacy in non-disclosure of familial genetic risk: What is it reasonable to expect?对不披露家族遗传风险的合理隐私期望:期望什么才合理?
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 4.