Suppr超能文献

儿童虚拟哮喘诊所:减少常规门诊就诊次数,哮喘控制效果相同。

A virtual asthma clinic for children: fewer routine outpatient visits, same asthma control.

机构信息

Dept of Paediatric Pulmonology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Dept of Paediatric Pulmonology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2017 Oct 5;50(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00471-2017. Print 2017 Oct.

Abstract

eHealth is an appealing medium to improve healthcare and its value (in addition to standard care) has been assessed in previous studies. We aimed to assess whether an eHealth intervention could improve asthma control while reducing 50% of routine outpatient visits.In a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with a 16-month follow-up, asthmatic children (6-16 years) treated in eight Dutch hospitals were randomised to usual care (4-monthly outpatient visits) and online care using a virtual asthma clinic (VAC) (8-monthly outpatient visits with monthly web-based monitoring). Outcome measures were the number of symptom-free days in the last 4 weeks of the study, asthma control, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, exhaled nitric oxide fraction, asthma exacerbations, unscheduled outpatient visits, hospital admissions, daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids and courses of systemic corticosteroids.We included 210 children. After follow-up, symptom-free days differed statistically between the usual care and VAC groups (difference of 1.23 days, 95% CI 0.42-2.04; p=0.003) in favour of the VAC. In terms of asthma control, the Childhood Asthma Control Test improved more in the VAC group (difference of 1.17 points, 95% CI 0.09-2.25; p=0.03). No differences were found for other outcome measures.Routine outpatient visits can partly be replaced by monitoring asthmatic children eHealth.

摘要

电子健康是改善医疗保健的一种有吸引力的媒介,其价值(除了标准护理)已在以前的研究中得到评估。我们旨在评估电子健康干预措施是否可以改善哮喘控制,同时减少 50%的常规门诊就诊次数。

在一项为期 16 个月的多中心随机对照试验中,8 家荷兰医院治疗的哮喘儿童(6-16 岁)被随机分为常规护理组(每 4 个月门诊就诊)和使用虚拟哮喘诊所(VAC)的在线护理组(每 8 个月门诊就诊,每月进行基于网络的监测)。

研究的最后 4 周内无症状天数、哮喘控制、1 秒用力呼气量、呼出一氧化氮分数、哮喘加重、非计划性门诊就诊、住院、吸入皮质激素的每日剂量和全身皮质激素疗程均为疗效评估指标。

共纳入 210 名儿童。随访后,常规护理组和 VAC 组在无症状天数方面存在统计学差异(VAC 组差异为 1.23 天,95%CI 0.42-2.04;p=0.003),VAC 组更有利。在哮喘控制方面,儿童哮喘控制测试(Childhood Asthma Control Test)在 VAC 组中改善更多(差异为 1.17 分,95%CI 0.09-2.25;p=0.03)。

对于其他评估指标,两组间无差异。

通过电子健康监测,可以部分替代常规门诊就诊来管理哮喘儿童。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验