Virgilio Edoardo, Balducci Genoveffa, Mercantini Paolo, Ferri Mario, Bocchetti Tommaso, Caterino Salvatore, Salvi Pier Federico, Ziparo Vincenzo, Cavallini Marco
Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology "Sapienza", St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology "Sapienza", St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Anticancer Res. 2017 Oct;37(10):5595-5602. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11993.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Distal gastrectomy (DG) represents the only curative treatment for most mid-lower gastric cancers (GCs). As of 2017, however, no reconstructive modality to conduct after DG has gained unanimous consensus. Additionally, most authors have investigated Billroth 1 and Roux-en-Y (RY) rather than Billroth 2 (B2) reconstruction. We analyzed B2 and RY gastrojejunostomy to identify the preferable technique and augment the available information on B2 restoration.
We retrospectively selected 132 GC patients who were consecutively submitted to DG at our institution between April 2005 and February 2016. B2 and RY anastomosis were accomplished as methods of reconstruction (respectively 36 and 96 cases). We compared these techniques in terms of clinicopathological, surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes.
Compared to RY gastrojejunostomy, B2 reconstruction was significantly associated with a greater mean number of harvested lymph nodes (26.03 vs. 21.65, p=0.045) but also with a longer hospital stay (22.8 vs. 15.7 days) (p=0.022) and higher readmission rate (28.57% vs. 3.1%, p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, reconstruction method was the most significant independent prognostic factor for hospital readmission.
In light of our results, we propose that B2 gastrojejunostomy deserves more study in order to better identify the best post-DG anastomosis.
背景/目的:远端胃切除术(DG)是大多数中下段胃癌(GC)的唯一根治性治疗方法。然而,截至2017年,DG术后的重建方式尚未达成一致共识。此外,大多数作者研究的是毕罗Ⅰ式和 Roux-en-Y(RY)吻合术,而非毕罗Ⅱ式(B2)重建术。我们分析了B2和RY胃空肠吻合术,以确定更优技术,并增加有关B2重建的可用信息。
我们回顾性选择了2005年4月至2016年2月期间在我院连续接受DG的132例GC患者。分别采用B2和RY吻合术作为重建方法(分别为36例和96例)。我们在临床病理、手术、术后和肿瘤学结局方面比较了这些技术。
与RY胃空肠吻合术相比,B2重建术与平均清扫淋巴结数量更多显著相关(26.03对21.65,p=0.045),但住院时间也更长(22.8天对15.7天)(p=0.022),再入院率更高(28.57%对3.1%,p<0.0001)。多因素分析显示,重建方法是医院再入院最重要的独立预后因素。
根据我们的结果,我们认为B2胃空肠吻合术值得进一步研究,以便更好地确定DG术后的最佳吻合方式。