Beresford Thomas, Buchanan Jennifer, Thumm Elizabeth Brie, Emrick Chad, Weitzenkamp David, Ronan Patrick J
From the *Laboratory for Clinical and Translational Research in Psychiatry, Department of Veterans Affairs, and †Denver Research Institute; and the ‡Colorado Biostatistics Consortium, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Dec;37(6):657-663. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000789.
Co-occurring schizophrenia spectrum disorder and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision cocaine dependence present a particularly destructive constellation that is often difficult to treat. Both conditions raise dopamine transmission effects in the brain. Traditional neuroleptics block dopamine receptors, whereas aripiprazole modulates dopamine activity as an agonist/antagonist. We tested whether dopamine modulation is superior to dopamine blocking in dual-diagnosis patients.
In a randomized, double-blind, comparison design, cocaine-dependent schizophrenic subjects actively using cocaine received either aripiprazole or perphenazine in an 8-week trial. Primary outcome targeted cocaine-free urine sample proportions, whereas cocaine craving scores were a secondary variable.
Subjects (N = 44) randomized (n = 22 per group) did not differ at baseline. The proportion of cocaine-free urine samples did not differ by medication group. Contrasting weeks 3 to 5 vs 6 to 8 revealed significant late reductions in craving with aripiprazole. On the respective 5-point subscales, craving intensity decreased by 1.53 ± 0.43 (P < 0.0005) points, craving frequency by 1.4 ± 0.40 (P > 0.0004) points, and craving duration by 1.76 ± 0.44 (P > 0.0001) points.
A drug effect of aripiprazole on craving items appeared at week 6 of treatment, on average, and was not seen before that length of drug exposure. The data suggest that dopamine modulation reduces cocaine cravings but requires an acclimation period. To understand the mechanism of action better, a trial of depot aripiprazole may be useful. Clinically, a reduction in craving potentially offers a clearer focus for ongoing behavioral treatment. It may also offer a longer-term treatment effect with respect to the severity of relapse.
同时存在精神分裂症谱系障碍和《国际疾病分类》第十版可卡因依赖是一种特别具有破坏性的组合,通常难以治疗。这两种情况都会提高大脑中的多巴胺传递效应。传统抗精神病药物会阻断多巴胺受体,而阿立哌唑作为激动剂/拮抗剂调节多巴胺活性。我们测试了在双重诊断患者中,多巴胺调节是否优于多巴胺阻断。
在一项随机、双盲、比较设计中,积极使用可卡因的可卡因依赖型精神分裂症患者在为期8周的试验中接受阿立哌唑或奋乃静治疗。主要结局指标是无可卡因尿液样本的比例,而可卡因渴求分数是次要变量。
随机分组的受试者(N = 44,每组n = 22)在基线时无差异。无可卡因尿液样本的比例在药物组之间没有差异。对比第3至5周与第6至8周发现,阿立哌唑使渴求在后期显著降低。在各自的5分量表上,渴求强度降低了1.53±0.43(P < 0.0005)分,渴求频率降低了1.4±0.40(P > 0.0004)分,渴求持续时间降低了1.76±0.44(P > 0.0001)分。
阿立哌唑对渴求项目的药物效应平均在治疗第6周出现,在达到该药物暴露时长之前未观察到。数据表明多巴胺调节可减少可卡因渴求,但需要一个适应期。为了更好地理解作用机制,长效阿立哌唑试验可能会有用。临床上,渴求的降低可能为正在进行的行为治疗提供更明确的重点。就复发严重程度而言,它也可能提供长期治疗效果。