Barker Alan F, Campos Michael A, Brantly Mark L, Stocks James M, Sandhaus Robert A, Lee Douglas, Steinmann Kimberly, Lin Jiang, Sorrells Susan
a Department of Medicine , Oregon Health and Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
b Department of Medicine , University of Miami School of Medicine , Miami , Florida , USA.
COPD. 2017 Dec;14(6):590-596. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1376044. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
This study evaluated the bioequivalence, safety, and immunogenicity of a new liquid formulation of human plasma-derived alpha-proteinase inhibitor, Liquid Alpha-PI, compared with the Lyophilized Alpha-PI formulation (Prolastin®-C), for augmentation therapy in patients with alpha-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). In this double-blind, randomized, 20-week crossover study, 32 subjects with AATD were randomized to receive 8 weekly infusions of 60 mg/kg of Liquid Alpha-PI or Lyophilized Alpha-PI. Serial blood samples were drawn for 7 days after the last dose followed by 8 weeks of the alternative treatment. The primary endpoint was bioequivalence at steady state, as measured by area under the concentration versus time curve from 0 to 7 days (AUC) postdose using an antigenic content assay. Bioequivalence was defined as 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares (LS) mean of AUC for both products within the limits of 0.80 and 1.25. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. Mean alpha-PI concentration versus time curves for both formulations were superimposable. Mean AUC was 20 320 versus 19 838 mg × h/dl for Liquid Alpha-PI and Lyophilized Alpha-PI, respectively. The LS mean ratio of AUC (90% CI) for Liquid Alpha-PI versus Lyophilized Alpha-PI was 1.05 (1.03-1.08), indicating bioequivalence. Liquid Alpha-PI was well tolerated and adverse events were consistent with Lyophilized Alpha-PI. Immunogenicity to either product was not detected. In conclusion, Liquid Alpha-PI is bioequivalent to Lyophilized Alpha-PI, with a similar safety profile. The liquid formulation would eliminate the need for reconstitution and shorten preparation time for patients receiving augmentation therapy for AATD.
本研究评估了一种新的人血浆源性α-蛋白酶抑制剂液体制剂(液体α-PI)与冻干α-PI制剂(普洛斯汀®-C)相比,用于α-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(AATD)患者增强治疗时的生物等效性、安全性和免疫原性。在这项双盲、随机、为期20周的交叉研究中,32名AATD患者被随机分配接受8次每周一次、剂量为60mg/kg的液体α-PI或冻干α-PI输注。在最后一剂后连续7天采集血样,随后进行8周的替代治疗。主要终点是稳态时的生物等效性,通过使用抗原含量测定法测定给药后0至7天的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量。生物等效性定义为两种产品AUC几何最小二乘(LS)均值之比的90%置信区间(CI)在0.80至1.25范围内。评估了安全性和免疫原性。两种制剂的平均α-PI浓度-时间曲线可叠加。液体α-PI和冻干α-PI的平均AUC分别为20320和19838mg×h/dl。液体α-PI与冻干α-PI的AUC的LS均值比(90%CI)为1.05(1.03 - 1.08),表明具有生物等效性。液体α-PI耐受性良好,不良事件与冻干α-PI一致。未检测到对任何一种产品的免疫原性。总之,液体α-PI与冻干α-PI具有生物等效性,安全性相似。液体制剂将消除重构的需要,并缩短接受AATD增强治疗患者的准备时间。